CAML.L vs. GGP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Central Asia Metals plc (CAML.L) and Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L).
Performance
CAML.L vs. GGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAML.L vs. GGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAML.L Central Asia Metals plc | -11.38% | 30.42% | -4.92% | -19.97% | 4.93% | 15.02% | 12.57% | 8.10% | -24.46% | 44.65% |
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 27.03% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 1,950.00% | -0.55% | -2.95% | 997.06% |
Fundamentals
CAML.L:
£288.23M
GGP.L:
£4.53B
CAML.L:
-£0.14
GGP.L:
£0.48
CAML.L:
0.68
GGP.L:
4.73
CAML.L:
1.01
GGP.L:
5.37
CAML.L:
£444.93M
GGP.L:
£937.29M
CAML.L:
£207.40M
GGP.L:
£483.25M
CAML.L:
£205.70M
GGP.L:
£477.73M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAML.L achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than GGP.L's 27.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CAML.L has underperformed GGP.L with an annualized return of 7.40%, while GGP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 72.13% annualized return.
CAML.L
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 15.72%
- 3Y*
- -3.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
GGP.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- 27.03%
- 6M
- 81.42%
- 1Y
- 167.02%
- 3Y*
- 56.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 72.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAML.L vs. GGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
CAML.L
GGP.L
CAML.L vs. GGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Asia Metals plc (CAML.L) and Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAML.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 2.39 | -2.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 2.68 | -2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 4.80 | -4.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 12.24 | -10.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAML.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 2.39 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.18 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.78 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.14 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between CAML.L and GGP.L is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CAML.L vs. GGP.L - Dividend Comparison
CAML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, while GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAML.L Central Asia Metals plc | 8.10% | 7.18% | 11.46% | 10.51% | 8.87% | 6.18% | 2.50% | 6.59% | 7.59% | 5.39% | 5.94% | 7.82% |
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CAML.L vs. GGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAML.L drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, smaller than the maximum GGP.L drawdown of -98.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML.L and GGP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAML.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -98.48% | +36.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.98% | -35.27% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.66% | -78.39% | +35.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.86% | -86.35% | +24.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.01% | -11.35% | -19.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -65.64% | +47.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 13.82% | -2.47% |
Volatility
CAML.L vs. GGP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Central Asia Metals plc (CAML.L) is 13.82%, while Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a volatility of 27.77%. This indicates that CAML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAML.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.82% | 27.77% | -13.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.47% | 45.25% | -8.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.95% | 70.98% | -29.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 65.86% | -30.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.58% | 92.52% | -55.94% |
Financials
CAML.L vs. GGP.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Asia Metals plc and Greatland Gold plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAML.L vs. GGP.L - Profitability Comparison
CAML.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Central Asia Metals plc reported a gross profit of 64.15M and revenue of 131.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
GGP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a gross profit of 245.52M and revenue of 478.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.
CAML.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Central Asia Metals plc reported an operating income of 46.18M and revenue of 131.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.2%.
GGP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported an operating income of 236.40M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.
CAML.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Central Asia Metals plc reported a net income of -84.40M and revenue of 131.03M, resulting in a net margin of -64.4%.
GGP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a net income of 167.80M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.