CAML.L vs. RING
Compare and contrast key facts about Central Asia Metals plc (CAML.L) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING).
RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.
Performance
CAML.L vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAML.L vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAML.L Central Asia Metals plc | -11.38% | 30.42% | -4.92% | -19.97% | 4.93% | 15.02% | 12.57% | 8.10% | -24.46% | 44.65% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 13.04% | 145.86% | 18.00% | 6.68% | -5.34% | -6.59% | 21.31% | 44.21% | -7.99% | 0.70% |
Different Trading Currencies
CAML.L is traded in GBp, while RING is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RING values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAML.L achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CAML.L has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 7.40%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 19.64% annualized return.
CAML.L
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 15.72%
- 3Y*
- -3.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
RING
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 27.55%
- 1Y
- 113.93%
- 3Y*
- 46.41%
- 5Y*
- 26.97%
- 10Y*
- 19.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAML.L vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank
CAML.L
RING
CAML.L vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Asia Metals plc (CAML.L) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAML.L | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 2.54 | -2.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 2.70 | -2.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.39 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 3.74 | -3.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 13.75 | -12.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAML.L | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 2.54 | -2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.82 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.56 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.17 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between CAML.L and RING is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CAML.L vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
CAML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, more than RING's 0.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAML.L Central Asia Metals plc | 8.10% | 7.18% | 11.46% | 10.51% | 8.87% | 6.18% | 2.50% | 6.59% | 7.59% | 5.39% | 5.94% | 7.82% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.75% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
CAML.L vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAML.L drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -78.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML.L and RING.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAML.L | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -79.47% | +17.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.98% | -30.11% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.66% | -47.94% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.86% | -52.04% | -9.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.01% | -17.83% | -13.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -47.73% | +29.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 8.52% | +2.83% |
Volatility
CAML.L vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Central Asia Metals plc (CAML.L) is 13.82%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 16.23%. This indicates that CAML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAML.L | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.82% | 16.23% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.47% | 37.30% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.95% | 44.40% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 33.04% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.58% | 35.30% | +1.28% |