PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CALF vs. LEAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CALF vs. LEAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than LEAD's 16.18% return.


CALF

1D
0.46%
1M
7.83%
YTD
14.10%
6M
11.90%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*

LEAD

1D
0.83%
1M
2.38%
YTD
16.18%
6M
15.19%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CALF vs. LEAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
14.10%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
16.18%15.52%10.32%26.25%-18.16%29.69%23.41%33.75%-6.63%12.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CALF and LEAD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017

0.69

The correlation between CALF and LEAD shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CALF vs. LEAD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CALF
LEAD

Technology

29.7%
36.9%

Consumer Cyclical

28.3%
1.4%

Energy

10.3%
1.3%

Healthcare

9.4%
5.8%

Communication Services

8.8%
0.1%

Industrials

5.9%
30.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
16.2%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CALF
29.7%
LEAD
36.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CALF
28.3%
LEAD
1.4%

Energy

CALF
10.3%
LEAD
1.3%

Healthcare

CALF
9.4%
LEAD
5.8%

Communication Services

CALF
8.8%
LEAD
0.1%

Industrials

CALF
5.9%
LEAD
30.6%

Consumer Defensive

CALF
4.3%
LEAD
3.6%

Real Estate

CALF
1.6%
LEAD

-

Basic Materials

CALF
1.6%
LEAD

-

Financial Services

CALF
0.2%
LEAD
16.2%

Utilities

CALF

-

LEAD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CALF vs. LEAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

LEAD
LEAD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LEAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALF vs. LEAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CALFLEADDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

2.98

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.43

12.62

+0.81

CALF vs. LEAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALF Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the LEAD Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALF and LEAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CALF vs. LEAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than LEAD's maximum drawdown of -32.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and LEAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CALFLEADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.58%

-32.19%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-8.65%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

-17.86%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

-24.93%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-4.41%

-6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.05%

+0.13%

Volatility

CALF vs. LEAD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) is 4.93%, while Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that CALF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CALFLEADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

6.06%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

12.26%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

15.26%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.43%

17.46%

+5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.99%

18.70%

+7.29%

CALF vs. LEAD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than LEAD's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

CALF vs. LEAD - Dividend Comparison

CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than LEAD's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.20%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%0.00%
LEAD
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
0.57%0.70%0.93%1.13%1.27%1.79%0.81%1.32%1.38%0.97%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


CALF and LEAD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEAD has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to CALF (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs LEAD's -32.19%.

On 5-year performance, LEAD leads with 12.25% vs 3.80% for CALF. On fees, LEAD is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LEAD has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LEAD is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.57% for LEAD.

CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while LEAD is Large Cap Growth Equities. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while LEAD tracks Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.43% for LEAD.

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CALF and LEAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer