CALF vs. ICOW
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CALF is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CALF returned 5.43%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for ICOW. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
CALF vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly higher than ICOW's 10.27% return.
CALF
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 26.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
CALF vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 17.73% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 10.27% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -16.09% | 16.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and ICOW is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CALF and ICOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CALF vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
ICOW
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CALF
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
ICOW
Healthcare
CALF
ICOW
Energy
CALF
ICOW
Communication Services
CALF
ICOW
Industrials
CALF
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
CALF
ICOW
Basic Materials
CALF
ICOW
Real Estate
CALF
ICOW
-
Financial Services
CALF
ICOW
-
Utilities
CALF
-
ICOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
ICOW
CALF vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CALF | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 2.93 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.58 | 8.74 | +3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CALF vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than ICOW's maximum drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -43.49% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -8.92% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -14.81% | -19.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | -27.79% | -6.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.63% | +6.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.63% | -7.56% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.99% | -0.75% |
Volatility
CALF vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) is 4.71%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that CALF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 5.06% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 12.11% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 14.73% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 16.76% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 18.48% | +7.44% |
CALF vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than ICOW's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 1.17% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.31% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALF and ICOW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOW has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to CALF (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 9.20% vs 5.43% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.17% for CALF.
CALF is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer