CALF vs. FNK
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF) and FNK (First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - CALF tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index while FNK tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CALF returned 6.29%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for FNK. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FNK.
Performance
CALF vs. FNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than FNK's 14.72% return.
CALF
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 19.77%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 1Y
- 39.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.37%
FNK
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.38M | $24.48M | $25.33M | |
| $141.83K | $192.54K | $284.84K |
CALF vs. FNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 22.50% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 14.72% | 5.65% | 6.65% | 21.03% | -7.24% | 33.60% | 1.23% | 20.56% | -14.72% | 10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and FNK is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between CALF and FNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
CALF vs. FNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
FNK
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Technology
CALF
FNK
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
FNK
Energy
CALF
FNK
Healthcare
CALF
FNK
Industrials
CALF
FNK
Communication Services
CALF
FNK
Consumer Defensive
CALF
FNK
Basic Materials
CALF
FNK
Real Estate
CALF
FNK
Financial Services
CALF
FNK
Utilities
CALF
-
FNK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. FNK — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
FNK
CALF vs. FNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CALF | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.28 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.13 | 2.50 | +3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.68 | 7.45 | +10.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CALF vs. FNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, smaller than the maximum FNK drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and FNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -50.70% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.02% | -9.13% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -25.16% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | -25.16% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -1.34% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -6.78% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 3.06% | -0.97% |
Volatility
CALF vs. FNK - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) at 3.86%. This indicates that CALF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | FNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 3.86% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 9.46% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 14.75% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 20.89% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 23.75% | +2.14% |
CALF vs. FNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FNK's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. FNK - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than FNK's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 1.12% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.43% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.76% | 1.40% | 1.38% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALF and FNK have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to FNK (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs FNK's -50.70%.
On 5-year performance, FNK leads with 9.09% vs 6.29% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FNK has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNK has performed better with a 9.09% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.
FNK has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.12% for CALF.
CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while FNK tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.70% for FNK.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and FNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer