CAH vs. NEE
CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) and NEE (NextEra Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. CAH operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare), while NEE operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, CAH returned 14.13%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for NEE. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAH vs. NEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAH achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly higher than NEE's 7.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CAH having a 14.13% annualized return and NEE not far behind at 13.49%.
CAH
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- 21.14%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 45.67%
- 3Y*
- 38.65%
- 5Y*
- 33.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
NEE
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -9.65%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 19.58%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
CAH vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 8.15% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 7.18% | 15.47% | 21.46% | -25.30% | -8.54% | 23.39% | 30.06% | 42.69% | 14.30% | 34.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAH and NEE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2003 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CAH and NEE shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAH:
$6.55
NEE:
$5.27
CAH:
33.76
NEE:
16.10
CAH:
0.80
NEE:
0.82
CAH:
0.21
NEE:
4.72
CAH:
$250.55B
NEE:
$27.93B
CAH:
$9.23B
NEE:
$13.35B
CAH:
$2.79B
NEE:
$14.56B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAH vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank
CAH
NEE
CAH vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAH | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 1.35 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 3.77 | +2.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAH vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAH drawdown since its inception was -61.93%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAH and NEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAH | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.93% | -47.81% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.42% | -14.53% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.42% | -34.57% | +14.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.80% | -44.97% | +22.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.13% | -44.97% | -1.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.56% | -12.69% | +9.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -8.93% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 5.20% | +2.55% |
Volatility
CAH vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) is 7.28%, while NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) has a volatility of 8.35%. This indicates that CAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAH | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.28% | 8.35% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.29% | 16.82% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.28% | 23.75% | +6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.25% | 26.92% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 25.49% | +3.77% |
Dividends
CAH vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison
CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than NEE's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 2.80% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 3.08% | 2.03% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 2.06% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 2.91% | 2.96% |
Financials
CAH vs. NEE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Health, Inc. and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAH vs. NEE - Profitability Comparison
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 60.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.
NEE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
NEE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.21B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 399.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
NEE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAH and NEE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEE has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to CAH (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAH dropped -61.93% vs NEE's -47.81%.
CAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAH and NEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer