CAG vs. VWO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) is a stock, while VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Over the past 10 years, CAG returned -5.70%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for VWO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CAG vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed VWO with an annualized return of -5.70%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.00% annualized return.

CAG

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: -2.48%
• YTD: -17.02%
• 6M: -19.07%
• 1Y: -32.99%
• 3Y*: -21.83%
• 5Y*: -13.84%
• 10Y*: -5.70%

VWO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -0.65%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 24.61%
• 3Y*: 16.61%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 9.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAG vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc.	-17.02%	-33.32%	1.46%	-22.82%	17.52%	-2.55%	8.69%	65.50%	-41.99%	-2.55%
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	10.77%	25.60%	10.59%	9.25%	-17.98%	1.26%	15.17%	20.75%	-14.76%	31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CAG and VWO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005	0.26

The correlation between CAG and VWO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CAG vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAG

CAG Risk / Return Rank: 5
CAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CAG Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

VWO

VWO Risk / Return Rank: 50
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAG vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAG	VWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	1.49	-2.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.69	2.10	-3.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.28	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	2.21	-3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.81	7.80	-9.62

CAG vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAG Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAG and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CAG vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and VWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAG	VWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.52%	-67.68%	+5.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.75%	-11.17%	-25.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.85%	-17.37%	-39.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.52%	-32.60%	-29.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.52%	-36.39%	-26.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.06%	-2.68%	-56.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.76%	-15.80%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.37%	3.17%	+17.20%

Volatility

CAG vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 6.64%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAG	VWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.53%	6.64%	+1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.11%	14.04%	+8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.21%	16.54%	+11.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.36%	17.48%	+5.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.20%	19.22%	+6.98%

Dividends

CAG vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.19%, more than VWO's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc.	10.19%	8.09%	5.05%	4.75%	3.32%	3.44%	2.52%	2.48%	3.98%	2.19%	29.36%	2.37%
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	2.44%	2.79%	3.20%	3.52%	4.11%	2.63%	1.91%	3.23%	2.88%	2.30%	2.52%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAG and VWO in my portfolio?

CAG and VWO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAG or VWO?

CAG has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to VWO (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs VWO's -67.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.