CAG vs. QQQM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, CAG returned -11.75%/yr vs 15.34%/yr for QQQM. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

CAG vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -12.61% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 15.22% return.

CAG

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: 6.71%
• 6M: -12.91%
• YTD: -12.61%
• 1Y: -17.42%
• 3Y*: -18.70%
• 5Y*: -11.75%
• 10Y*: -5.50%

QQQM

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -3.18%
• 6M: 13.83%
• YTD: 15.22%
• 1Y: 27.34%
• 3Y*: 23.46%
• 5Y*: 15.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAG vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc.	-12.61%	-33.32%	1.46%	-22.82%	17.52%	-2.55%	-3.86%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	15.22%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between CAG and QQQM is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	-0.02

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CAG and QQQM has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

CAG vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAG

CAG Risk / Return Rank: 21
CAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CAG Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CAG Martin Ratio Rank: 23

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 54
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAG vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAG	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	1.48	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.70	2.01	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.26	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	2.30	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	8.14	-9.13

CAG vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAG Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAG and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CAG vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAG	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.52%	-35.04%	-27.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.58%	-11.96%	-23.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.66%	-22.70%	-33.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.52%	-35.04%	-27.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.89%	-5.28%	-51.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-8.15%	-7.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.52%	3.37%	+14.15%

Volatility

CAG vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 12.84% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 7.39%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAG	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.84%	7.39%	+5.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.32%	15.34%	+8.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.77%	18.54%	+11.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.86%	22.65%	+1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.48%	22.30%	+4.18%

Dividends

CAG vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, more than QQQM's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc.	9.68%	8.09%	5.05%	4.75%	3.32%	3.44%	2.52%	2.48%	3.98%	2.19%	29.36%	2.37%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.45%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAG and QQQM in my portfolio?

CAG and QQQM have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAG or QQQM?

CAG has higher volatility (12.84%) compared to QQQM (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.