PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAG vs. BYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CAG vs. BYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -24.02% return, which is significantly lower than BYD's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed BYD with an annualized return of -6.51%, while BYD has yielded a comparatively higher 16.94% annualized return.


CAG

1D
-2.18%
1M
-9.17%
YTD
-24.02%
6M
-23.36%
1Y
-39.73%
3Y*
-24.56%
5Y*
-16.05%
10Y*
-6.51%

BYD

1D
2.33%
1M
4.89%
YTD
2.24%
6M
5.80%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
16.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAG vs. BYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
-24.02%-33.32%1.46%-22.82%17.52%-2.55%8.69%65.50%-41.99%-2.55%
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
2.24%18.61%17.13%15.99%-15.74%52.77%43.35%45.51%-40.25%74.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CAG and BYD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 1993

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAG:

$6.02B

BYD:

$6.67B

EPS

CAG:

-$0.09

BYD:

$23.07

PS Ratio

CAG:

0.54

BYD:

1.69

PB Ratio

CAG:

0.74

BYD:

2.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAG:

$11.18B

BYD:

$4.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAG:

$2.70B

BYD:

$1.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

CAG:

$792.70M

BYD:

$2.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAG vs. BYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAG
CAG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BYD
BYD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAG vs. BYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAGBYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.13

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.02

1.40

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.97

3.12

-5.09

CAG vs. BYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAG Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the BYD Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAG and BYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAGBYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.43

0.65

-2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.69

0.25

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

0.39

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.09

+0.16

Drawdowns

CAG vs. BYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, smaller than the maximum BYD drawdown of -94.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and BYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAGBYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.52%

-94.49%

+31.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.25%

-12.59%

-26.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.93%

-30.29%

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.52%

-34.58%

-27.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.52%

-80.01%

+17.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.52%

-2.69%

-59.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-50.05%

+34.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.74%

5.64%

+15.10%

Volatility

CAG vs. BYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) is 7.94%, while Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) has a volatility of 8.46%. This indicates that CAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAGBYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.94%

8.46%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

20.29%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.90%

27.03%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.33%

31.85%

-8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.18%

43.20%

-17.02%

Dividends

CAG vs. BYD - Dividend Comparison

CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.13%, more than BYD's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
0.85%0.84%0.94%1.02%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.90%1.11%0.43%0.00%0.00%
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
11.13%8.09%5.05%4.75%3.32%3.44%2.52%2.48%3.98%2.19%29.36%2.37%

Financials

CAG vs. BYD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Boyd Gaming Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.79B
997.36M
(CAG) Total Revenue
(BYD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CAG vs. BYD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Boyd Gaming Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
23.6%
39.8%
Portfolio components
CAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.70M and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.

BYD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a gross profit of 397.11M and revenue of 997.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

CAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 280.10M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

BYD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported an operating income of 163.99M and revenue of 997.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

CAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 199.80M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

BYD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a net income of 105.54M and revenue of 997.36M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CAG and BYD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYD has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to CAG (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs BYD's -94.49%.

BYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAG and BYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer