PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAG vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAG vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -22.39% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 6.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed VDC with an annualized return of -6.40%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.74% annualized return.


CAG

1D
-2.65%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-22.39%
6M
-22.17%
1Y
-35.03%
3Y*
-23.26%
5Y*
-14.02%
10Y*
-6.40%

VDC

1D
-0.71%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
6.86%
6M
6.42%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
7.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAG vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
-22.39%-33.32%1.46%-22.82%17.52%-2.55%8.69%65.50%-41.99%-2.55%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
6.86%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CAG and VDC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.59

The correlation between CAG and VDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAG vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAG
CAG Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAG vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAGVDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.08

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

0.55

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.86

1.09

-2.95

CAG vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAG Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAG and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAG vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAGVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.52%

-34.24%

-28.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.75%

-9.28%

-27.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.66%

-11.78%

-44.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.52%

-16.55%

-45.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.52%

-25.31%

-37.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.71%

-7.56%

-54.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.79%

-3.73%

-12.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.82%

4.65%

+14.17%

Volatility

CAG vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.82%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAGVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.12%

4.82%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

10.20%

+12.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.37%

12.69%

+15.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.41%

13.18%

+10.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.24%

14.68%

+11.56%

Dividends

CAG vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%, more than VDC's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
10.89%8.09%5.05%4.75%3.32%3.44%2.52%2.48%3.98%2.19%29.36%2.37%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.15%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAG and VDC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAG has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to VDC (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs VDC's -34.24%.

VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAG and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer