PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYD vs. MGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYD vs. MGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYD achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than MGM's 28.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BYD has outperformed MGM with an annualized return of 17.65%, while MGM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.05% annualized return.


BYD

1D
0.06%
1M
9.19%
YTD
1.84%
6M
1.31%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
17.65%

MGM

1D
0.75%
1M
22.19%
YTD
28.58%
6M
26.91%
1Y
41.11%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
8.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYD vs. MGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
1.84%18.61%17.13%15.99%-15.74%52.77%43.35%45.51%-40.25%74.70%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
28.58%5.31%-22.45%33.25%-25.27%42.47%-4.56%39.69%-26.16%17.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BYD and MGM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 1993

0.50

The correlation between BYD and MGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BYD:

$6.63B

MGM:

$12.15B

EPS

BYD:

$23.07

MGM:

$0.68

PE Ratio

BYD:

3.75

MGM:

68.77

PEG Ratio

BYD:

0.05

MGM:

0.77

PS Ratio

BYD:

1.68

MGM:

0.71

PB Ratio

BYD:

2.62

MGM:

4.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYD:

$4.10B

MGM:

$17.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYD:

$1.62B

MGM:

$5.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

BYD:

$2.78B

MGM:

$1.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYD vs. MGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYD
BYD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MGM
MGM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYD vs. MGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYDMGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.21

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

1.82

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

3.87

-1.54

BYD vs. MGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYD Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the MGM Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYD and MGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYD vs. MGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYD drawdown since its inception was -94.49%, roughly equal to the maximum MGM drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYD and MGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYDMGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.49%

-98.11%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.59%

-22.76%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.29%

-49.33%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.58%

-49.33%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.01%

-80.42%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-50.21%

+47.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.64%

-46.42%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

10.66%

-4.98%

Volatility

BYD vs. MGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is 8.26%, while MGM Resorts International (MGM) has a volatility of 18.70%. This indicates that BYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYDMGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

18.70%

-10.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.41%

31.49%

-11.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.14%

39.60%

-12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.82%

40.44%

-8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.20%

45.79%

-2.59%

Dividends

BYD vs. MGM - Dividend Comparison

BYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while MGM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
0.88%0.84%0.94%1.02%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.90%1.11%0.43%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.02%0.50%1.56%1.98%1.32%

Financials

BYD vs. MGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boyd Gaming Corporation and MGM Resorts International. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
997.36M
4.45B
(BYD) Total Revenue
(MGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BYD vs. MGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Boyd Gaming Corporation and MGM Resorts International over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
39.8%
0
Portfolio components
BYD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a gross profit of 397.11M and revenue of 997.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

MGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BYD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported an operating income of 163.99M and revenue of 997.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

MGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MGM Resorts International reported an operating income of 301.24M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

BYD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a net income of 105.54M and revenue of 997.36M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

MGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a net income of 125.14M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BYD and MGM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGM has higher volatility (18.70%) compared to BYD (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYD dropped -94.49% vs MGM's -98.11%.

MGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYD and MGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer