PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYD vs. MGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYD vs. MGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYD achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than MGM's 22.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BYD has outperformed MGM with an annualized return of 16.96%, while MGM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


BYD

1D
-2.29%
1M
-3.23%
6M
1.09%
YTD
0.26%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
16.96%
ALL TIME*
4.26%

MGM

1D
-2.39%
1M
-5.37%
6M
32.89%
YTD
22.14%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
-3.78%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
7.08%
ALL TIME*
7.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$105.45M$89.68M$88.22M
$110.27M$112.61M$186.79M

BYD vs. MGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
0.26%18.61%17.13%15.99%-15.74%52.77%43.35%45.51%-40.25%74.70%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
22.14%5.31%-22.45%33.25%-25.27%42.47%-4.56%39.69%-26.16%17.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BYD and MGM is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 1993

0.50

The correlation between BYD and MGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BYD:

$6.32B

MGM:

$11.21B

EPS

BYD:

$23.36

MGM:

$1.62

PE Ratio

BYD:

3.64

MGM:

27.55

PEG Ratio

BYD:

0.05

MGM:

0.31

PS Ratio

BYD:

1.61

MGM:

0.66

PB Ratio

BYD:

2.55

MGM:

4.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYD:

$4.10B

MGM:

$17.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYD:

$1.52B

MGM:

$5.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

BYD:

$2.76B

MGM:

$1.57B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYD vs. MGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BYD
BYD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYD Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

MGM
MGM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BYD vs. MGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYDMGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.14

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

0.98

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.20

2.07

-1.88

BYD vs. MGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYD Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the MGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYD and MGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYD vs. MGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYD drawdown since its inception was -94.49%, roughly equal to the maximum MGM drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYD and MGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYDMGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.49%

-98.11%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.59%

-22.76%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.58%

-46.02%

+20.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.58%

-49.33%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.01%

-80.42%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-52.70%

+45.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.48%

-46.43%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

10.79%

-5.16%

Volatility

BYD vs. MGM - Volatility Comparison

Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to MGM Resorts International (MGM) at 4.57%. This indicates that BYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYDMGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

4.57%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

30.87%

-10.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.27%

38.73%

-12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.46%

40.20%

-8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.18%

45.75%

-2.57%

Dividends

BYD vs. MGM - Dividend Comparison

BYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while MGM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
0.89%0.84%0.94%1.02%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.90%1.11%0.43%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.02%0.50%1.56%1.98%1.32%

Financials

BYD vs. MGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boyd Gaming Corporation and MGM Resorts International. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BYD vs. MGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Boyd Gaming Corporation and MGM Resorts International over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BYD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a gross profit of 429.06M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.5%.

MGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BYD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported an operating income of 200.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

MGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MGM Resorts International reported an operating income of 503.64M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

BYD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a net income of 131.23M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.

MGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a net income of 292.43M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BYD and MGM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYD has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to MGM (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYD dropped -94.49% vs MGM's -98.11%.

MGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYD and MGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer