PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAFG vs. GRPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CAFG vs. GRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CAFG vs. GRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
8.16%0.17%6.85%
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
3.76%3.09%4.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly higher than GRPZ's 3.76% return.


CAFG

1D
0.80%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
8.16%
6M
5.92%
1Y
14.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRPZ

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
3.76%
6M
3.27%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAFG vs. GRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GRPZ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CAFG vs. GRPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAFG
CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GRPZ
GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAFG vs. GRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAFGGRPZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

0.78

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

1.27

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.16

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.29

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.10

4.57

-0.47

CAFG vs. GRPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the GRPZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAFG and GRPZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAFGGRPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.78

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.26

+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between CAFG and GRPZ is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CAFG vs. GRPZ - Dividend Comparison

CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than GRPZ's 0.97% yield.


TTM202520242023
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.32%0.35%0.36%0.39%
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
0.97%0.97%0.73%0.00%

Drawdowns

CAFG vs. GRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum GRPZ drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and GRPZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CAFGGRPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.66%

-27.87%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-14.12%

+1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-6.27%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-7.42%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

4.00%

-0.60%

Volatility

CAFG vs. GRPZ - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) at 5.73%. This indicates that CAFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CAFGGRPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

5.73%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.26%

12.71%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.20%

22.52%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.75%

21.58%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

21.58%

-1.83%