PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CACC vs. PATH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CACC vs. PATH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACC achieves a 28.29% return, which is significantly higher than PATH's -22.15% return.


CACC

1D
2.38%
1M
-13.42%
6M
14.18%
YTD
28.29%
1Y
27.13%
3Y*
0.94%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
11.56%
ALL TIME*
17.46%

PATH

1D
3.15%
1M
8.97%
6M
1.35%
YTD
-22.15%
1Y
14.85%
3Y*
-10.49%
5Y*
-27.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$81.32M$84.95M$97.60M
$985.01M$993.57M$668.61M

CACC vs. PATH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CACC
Credit Acceptance Corporation
28.29%-5.54%-11.88%12.30%-31.01%82.30%
PATH
UiPath Inc.
-22.15%28.95%-48.83%95.44%-70.53%-34.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CACC and PATH is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.36

The correlation between CACC and PATH shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CACC:

$5.95B

PATH:

$6.79B

EPS

CACC:

$40.57

PATH:

$0.61

PE Ratio

CACC:

14.02

PATH:

21.02

PS Ratio

CACC:

2.75

PATH:

4.11

PB Ratio

CACC:

4.12

PATH:

3.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

CACC:

$2.31B

PATH:

$1.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CACC:

$1.28B

PATH:

$1.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

CACC:

$543.60M

PATH:

$115.98M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CACC vs. PATH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CACC
CACC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CACC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CACC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CACC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CACC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CACC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PATH
PATH Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PATH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PATH Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CACC vs. PATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CACCPATHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.08

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.17

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.68

0.27

+1.41

CACC vs. PATH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACC Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the PATH Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACC and PATH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CACC vs. PATH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACC drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, roughly equal to the maximum PATH drawdown of -88.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACC and PATH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CACCPATHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.00%

-88.98%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.71%

-51.37%

+29.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.74%

-65.10%

+32.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.68%

-85.56%

+39.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.29%

-85.01%

+66.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.64%

-74.06%

+43.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.64%

31.83%

-22.19%

Volatility

CACC vs. PATH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) is 8.57%, while UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a volatility of 18.18%. This indicates that CACC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CACCPATHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.57%

18.18%

-9.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.69%

42.10%

-13.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.78%

66.14%

-25.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.58%

63.82%

-22.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.13%

64.02%

-22.89%

Dividends

CACC vs. PATH - Dividend Comparison

Neither CACC nor PATH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CACC vs. PATH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credit Acceptance Corporation and UiPath Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CACC vs. PATH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credit Acceptance Corporation and UiPath Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CACC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credit Acceptance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 580.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PATH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.

CACC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credit Acceptance Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 580.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PATH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

CACC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credit Acceptance Corporation reported a net income of 135.80M and revenue of 580.00M, resulting in a net margin of 23.4%.

PATH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CACC and PATH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PATH has higher volatility (18.18%) compared to CACC (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CACC dropped -90.00% vs PATH's -88.98%.

CACC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CACC and PATH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer