PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CACC vs. PRAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CACC vs. PRAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACC achieves a 43.77% return, which is significantly higher than PRAA's 4.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CACC has outperformed PRAA with an annualized return of 12.49%, while PRAA has yielded a comparatively lower -4.02% annualized return.


CACC

1D
3.45%
1M
11.05%
6M
34.65%
YTD
43.77%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
12.49%

PRAA

1D
2.11%
1M
17.64%
6M
11.24%
YTD
4.07%
1Y
18.54%
3Y*
-7.51%
5Y*
-13.34%
10Y*
-4.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CACC vs. PRAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CACC
Credit Acceptance Corporation
43.77%-5.54%-11.88%12.30%-31.01%98.67%-21.75%15.87%18.02%48.72%
PRAA
PRA Group, Inc.
4.07%-15.32%-20.27%-22.44%-32.72%26.60%9.26%48.95%-26.60%-15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CACC and PRAA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2002

0.34

The correlation between CACC and PRAA shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CACC:

$6.67B

PRAA:

$702.17M

EPS

CACC:

$40.57

PRAA:

-$7.21

PS Ratio

CACC:

3.08

PRAA:

0.56

PB Ratio

CACC:

4.61

PRAA:

0.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

CACC:

$2.31B

PRAA:

$1.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CACC:

$1.28B

PRAA:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

CACC:

$543.60M

PRAA:

-$47.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CACC vs. PRAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CACC
CACC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CACC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CACC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CACC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CACC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CACC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAA
PRAA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PRAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CACC vs. PRAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CACCPRAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.12

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

0.44

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.54

1.06

+1.47

CACC vs. PRAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACC Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the PRAA Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACC and PRAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CACC vs. PRAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACC drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than PRAA's maximum drawdown of -83.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACC and PRAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CACCPRAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.00%

-83.83%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.95%

-42.34%

+19.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.74%

-62.79%

+30.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.68%

-79.35%

+33.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.93%

-79.35%

+22.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.43%

-71.44%

+63.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.66%

-32.45%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.69%

17.53%

-6.84%

Volatility

CACC vs. PRAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) is 8.14%, while PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) has a volatility of 15.71%. This indicates that CACC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CACCPRAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

15.71%

-7.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.10%

49.65%

-20.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.58%

58.40%

-17.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.49%

50.11%

-8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.16%

46.66%

-5.50%

Dividends

CACC vs. PRAA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CACC nor PRAA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CACC vs. PRAA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credit Acceptance Corporation and PRA Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
580.00M
314.53M
(CACC) Total Revenue
(PRAA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CACC vs. PRAA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credit Acceptance Corporation and PRA Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
77.5%
Portfolio components
CACC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Credit Acceptance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 580.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PRAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PRA Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 243.80M and revenue of 314.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

CACC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Credit Acceptance Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 580.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PRAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PRA Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 103.25M and revenue of 314.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.8%.

CACC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Credit Acceptance Corporation reported a net income of 135.80M and revenue of 580.00M, resulting in a net margin of 23.4%.

PRAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PRA Group, Inc. reported a net income of 28.21M and revenue of 314.53M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CACC and PRAA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRAA has higher volatility (15.71%) compared to CACC (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CACC dropped -90.00% vs PRAA's -83.83%.

CACC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CACC and PRAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer