PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CACC vs. RBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CACC vs. RBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACC achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than RBLX's -46.09% return.


CACC

1D
-0.07%
1M
6.82%
YTD
22.13%
6M
14.16%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
11.49%

RBLX

1D
-2.93%
1M
-8.18%
YTD
-46.09%
6M
-52.57%
1Y
-51.44%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
-15.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CACC vs. RBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CACC
Credit Acceptance Corporation
22.13%-5.54%-11.88%12.30%-31.01%71.43%
RBLX
Roblox Corporation
-46.09%40.04%26.55%60.65%-72.41%48.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CACC and RBLX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021

0.23

The correlation between CACC and RBLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CACC:

$5.93B

RBLX:

$31.09B

EPS

CACC:

$40.03

RBLX:

-$1.57

PS Ratio

CACC:

2.65

RBLX:

5.76

PB Ratio

CACC:

3.92

RBLX:

71.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

CACC:

$2.31B

RBLX:

$5.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CACC:

$1.28B

RBLX:

$4.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

CACC:

$543.60M

RBLX:

-$944.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CACC vs. RBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CACC
CACC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CACC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CACC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CACC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CACC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CACC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

RBLX
RBLX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CACC vs. RBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CACCRBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.85

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

-0.73

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.91

-1.28

+2.19

CACC vs. RBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACC Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the RBLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACC and RBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CACCRBLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

-0.87

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

-0.22

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.12

+0.43

Drawdowns

CACC vs. RBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACC drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than RBLX's maximum drawdown of -82.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACC and RBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CACCRBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.00%

-82.79%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-70.82%

+46.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.74%

-70.82%

+38.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.68%

-82.79%

+37.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.21%

-69.14%

+46.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-52.96%

+22.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.00%

40.11%

-28.11%

Volatility

CACC vs. RBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) is 9.79%, while Roblox Corporation (RBLX) has a volatility of 18.61%. This indicates that CACC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CACCRBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.79%

18.61%

-8.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.36%

47.79%

-19.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.95%

59.28%

-18.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.57%

69.22%

-27.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.33%

70.12%

-28.79%

Dividends

CACC vs. RBLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CACC nor RBLX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CACC vs. RBLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credit Acceptance Corporation and Roblox Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
580.00M
1.44B
(CACC) Total Revenue
(RBLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CACC vs. RBLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credit Acceptance Corporation and Roblox Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
79.6%
Portfolio components
CACC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credit Acceptance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 580.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RBLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.

CACC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credit Acceptance Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 580.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

RBLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roblox Corporation reported an operating income of -294.00M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in an operating margin of -20.4%.

CACC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credit Acceptance Corporation reported a net income of 135.80M and revenue of 580.00M, resulting in a net margin of 23.4%.

RBLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in a net margin of -17.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CACC and RBLX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBLX has higher volatility (18.61%) compared to CACC (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CACC dropped -90.00% vs RBLX's -82.79%.

CACC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CACC and RBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer