CACC vs. RBLX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX).

Performance

CACC vs. RBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CACC vs. RBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CACC Credit Acceptance Corporation	-5.38%	-5.54%	-11.88%	12.30%	-31.01%	71.43%
RBLX Roblox Corporation	-28.88%	40.04%	26.55%	60.65%	-72.41%	48.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CACC : $4.66B RBLX : $40.45B
EPS CACC : $37.02 RBLX : -$1.53
PS Ratio CACC : 2.09 RBLX : 8.19
PB Ratio CACC : 3.06 RBLX : 102.54
Total Revenue (TTM) CACC : $2.29B RBLX : $4.89B
Gross Profit (TTM) CACC : $1.63B RBLX : $1.16B
EBITDA (TTM) CACC : $677.90M RBLX : -$1.01B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACC achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly higher than RBLX's -28.88% return.

CACC

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -12.97%
• YTD: -5.38%
• 6M: -12.45%
• 1Y: -19.85%
• 3Y*: -1.27%
• 5Y*: 2.94%
• 10Y*: 8.62%

RBLX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: -14.55%
• YTD: -28.88%
• 6M: -57.01%
• 1Y: -5.51%
• 3Y*: 8.61%
• 5Y*: -3.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CACC vs. RBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CACC

CACC Risk / Return Rank: 16
CACC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CACC Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CACC Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CACC Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CACC Martin Ratio Rank: 8

RBLX

RBLX Risk / Return Rank: 37
RBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
RBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
RBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CACC vs. RBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CACC	RBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	-0.10	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	0.25	-0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.03	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	-0.02	-0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.54	-0.04	-1.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CACC vs. RBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACC Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the RBLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACC and RBLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CACC	RBLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	-0.10	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	-0.04	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	-0.05	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between CACC and RBLX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CACC vs. RBLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CACC nor RBLX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CACC vs. RBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACC drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than RBLX's maximum drawdown of -82.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACC and RBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CACC	RBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.00%	-82.79%	-7.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.41%	-63.33%	+38.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.68%	-82.79%	+37.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.73%	-59.29%	+19.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-52.58%	+21.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.17%	30.15%	-17.98%

Volatility

CACC vs. RBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) is 14.05%, while Roblox Corporation (RBLX) has a volatility of 16.83%. This indicates that CACC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CACC	RBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.05%	16.83%	-2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.39%	44.10%	-13.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.60%	56.25%	-14.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.79%	69.90%	-28.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.20%	70.09%	-28.89%

Financials