PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PATH vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PATH vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATH achieves a -22.15% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -30.77% return.


PATH

1D
3.15%
1M
8.97%
6M
1.35%
YTD
-22.15%
1Y
14.85%
3Y*
-10.49%
5Y*
-27.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.66%

PLTR

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.83%
6M
-16.05%
YTD
-30.77%
1Y
-20.23%
3Y*
83.27%
5Y*
41.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
53.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$985.01M$993.57M$668.61M
$3.87B$4.57B$5.46B

PATH vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PATH
UiPath Inc.
-22.15%28.95%-48.83%95.44%-70.53%-34.15%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-30.77%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PATH and PLTR is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.58

The correlation between PATH and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PATH:

$6.79B

PLTR:

$282.55B

EPS

PATH:

$0.61

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

PATH:

21.02

PLTR:

138.56

PS Ratio

PATH:

4.11

PLTR:

60.51

PB Ratio

PATH:

3.54

PLTR:

37.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

PATH:

$1.67B

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PATH:

$1.39B

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

PATH:

$115.98M

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PATH vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PATH
PATH Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PATH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PATH Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PATH vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PATHPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.96

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

-0.46

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

-0.87

+1.15

PATH vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATH Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATH and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PATH vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATH drawdown since its inception was -88.98%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATH and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PATHPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.98%

-84.62%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.37%

-48.22%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.10%

-48.22%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.56%

-79.14%

-6.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.01%

-40.60%

-44.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.06%

-40.24%

-33.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.83%

25.51%

+6.32%

Volatility

PATH vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a higher volatility of 18.18% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 13.63%. This indicates that PATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PATHPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.18%

13.63%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.10%

40.52%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.14%

52.38%

+13.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.82%

65.74%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.02%

69.46%

-5.44%

Dividends

PATH vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PATH nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PATH vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UiPath Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PATH vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UiPath Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PATH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

PATH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

PATH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PATH and PLTR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PATH has higher volatility (18.18%) compared to PLTR (13.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATH dropped -88.98% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

PATH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PATH and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer