PATH vs. TWLO
PATH (UiPath Inc.) and TWLO (Twilio Inc.) are both stocks. PATH operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while TWLO operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, PATH returned -31.88%/yr vs -13.78%/yr for TWLO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PATH vs. TWLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PATH achieves a -38.01% return, which is significantly lower than TWLO's 29.11% return.
PATH
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- -38.01%
- 6M
- -39.16%
- 1Y
- -16.58%
- 3Y*
- -13.56%
- 5Y*
- -31.88%
- 10Y*
- —
TWLO
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 29.11%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 57.63%
- 3Y*
- 42.08%
- 5Y*
- -13.78%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
PATH vs. TWLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATH UiPath Inc. | -38.01% | 28.95% | -48.83% | 95.44% | -70.53% | -34.15% |
TWLO Twilio Inc. | 29.11% | 31.61% | 42.45% | 54.96% | -81.41% | -28.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PATH and TWLO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between PATH and TWLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PATH:
$5.36B
TWLO:
$28.97B
PATH:
$0.61
TWLO:
$0.66
PATH:
16.76
TWLO:
277.78
PATH:
3.28
TWLO:
5.45
PATH:
2.82
TWLO:
3.72
PATH:
$1.67B
TWLO:
$5.30B
PATH:
$1.39B
TWLO:
$2.59B
PATH:
$115.98M
TWLO:
$304.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PATH vs. TWLO — Risk / Return Rank
PATH
TWLO
PATH vs. TWLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Twilio Inc. (TWLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PATH | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.23 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 1.91 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 4.24 | -4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PATH vs. TWLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATH drawdown since its inception was -88.98%, roughly equal to the maximum TWLO drawdown of -90.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATH and TWLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PATH | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.98% | -90.36% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.37% | -30.34% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.10% | -45.17% | -19.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.84% | -89.57% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.06% | -58.59% | -29.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.79% | -49.52% | -24.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.42% | 13.64% | +15.78% |
Volatility
PATH vs. TWLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UiPath Inc. (PATH) is 17.07%, while Twilio Inc. (TWLO) has a volatility of 22.63%. This indicates that PATH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PATH | TWLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.07% | 22.63% | -5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.36% | 43.56% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.71% | 60.81% | +2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.46% | 59.27% | +4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.09% | 60.70% | +3.39% |
Dividends
PATH vs. TWLO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PATH nor TWLO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PATH vs. TWLO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UiPath Inc. and Twilio Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PATH vs. TWLO - Profitability Comparison
PATH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.
TWLO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported a gross profit of 684.24M and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.6%.
PATH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
TWLO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported an operating income of 107.67M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
PATH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
TWLO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported a net income of 90.14M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PATH and TWLO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TWLO has higher volatility (22.63%) compared to PATH (17.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATH dropped -88.98% vs TWLO's -90.36%.
TWLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PATH and TWLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer