PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CABZ vs. DRAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CABZ vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CABZ

1D
-6.81%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRAM

1D
-15.08%
1M
14.61%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABZ vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CABZ and DRAM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026

0.62

CABZ vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CABZ
DRAM

Technology

52.2%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

35.8%

-

Communication Services

12.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CABZ
52.2%
DRAM
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CABZ
35.8%
DRAM

-

Communication Services

CABZ
12.0%
DRAM

-

Basic Materials

CABZ

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Defensive

CABZ

-

DRAM

-

Energy

CABZ

-

DRAM

-

Financial Services

CABZ

-

DRAM

-

Healthcare

CABZ

-

DRAM

-

Industrials

CABZ

-

DRAM

-

Real Estate

CABZ

-

DRAM

-

Utilities

CABZ

-

DRAM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CABZ vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CABZ vs. DRAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CABZDRAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

63.39

-63.70

Drawdowns

CABZ vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and DRAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CABZDRAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-19.97%

-2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.64%

-19.97%

+10.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-2.15%

-6.32%

Volatility

CABZ vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CABZDRAMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.64%

85.33%

-51.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.64%

85.33%

-51.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.64%

85.33%

-51.69%

CABZ vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CABZ vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither CABZ nor DRAM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CABZ and DRAM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CABZ is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CABZ is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

CABZ and DRAM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.65% for DRAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CABZ and DRAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer