CABZ vs. ASMH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CABZ (Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CABZ is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CABZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

CABZ vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CABZ

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -5.10%
• 6M: -10.85%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 36.58%
• YTD: 71.44%
• 1Y: 143.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABZ vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	-11.63%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	43.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CABZ and ASMH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

CABZ vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CABZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CABZ vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CABZ	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	28.17	—

Drawdowns

CABZ vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CABZ	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.13%	-15.89%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.77%	-10.51%	-5.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.88%	-4.41%	-5.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CABZ	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.34%	43.78%	-8.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.34%	41.26%	-5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.34%	41.26%	-5.92%

CABZ vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CABZ vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

CABZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.63%	0.19%
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CABZ and ASMH in my portfolio?

CABZ and ASMH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CABZ or ASMH?

On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CABZ or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CABZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CABZ or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for CABZ.

What is the main difference between CABZ and ASMH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.19% for ASMH.