CABZ vs. PSI
CABZ (Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CABZ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. CABZ is actively managed, while PSI is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CABZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
CABZ vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CABZ
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSI
- 1D
- -5.52%
- 1M
- -12.90%
- 6M
- 58.34%
- YTD
- 84.16%
- 1Y
- 137.01%
- 3Y*
- 45.31%
- 5Y*
- 30.19%
- 10Y*
- 32.00%
CABZ vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF | -11.63% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 61.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CABZ and PSI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.73 |
CABZ vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CABZ
PSI
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CABZ
PSI
Consumer Cyclical
CABZ
PSI
-
Communication Services
CABZ
PSI
-
Industrials
CABZ
PSI
Basic Materials
CABZ
-
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
CABZ
-
PSI
-
Energy
CABZ
-
PSI
-
Financial Services
CABZ
-
PSI
-
Healthcare
CABZ
-
PSI
-
Real Estate
CABZ
-
PSI
-
Utilities
CABZ
-
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CABZ vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
CABZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSI
CABZ vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CABZ | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CABZ vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CABZ | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.13% | -62.96% | +39.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | -22.69% | +6.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -15.90% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.78% | — |
Volatility
CABZ vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CABZ | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.34% | 46.71% | -11.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.34% | 39.83% | -4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.34% | 36.11% | -0.77% |
CABZ vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
CABZ vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
CABZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.03% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CABZ and PSI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CABZ.
PSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for CABZ.
CABZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.56% for PSI.
Find the right allocation for CABZ and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer