PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C001.DE achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 20.65% return. Over the past 10 years, C001.DE has underperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 8.91%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.42% annualized return.


C001.DE

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
1.38%
6M
3.43%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
8.91%

6AQQ.DE

1D
-0.84%
1M
7.97%
YTD
20.65%
6M
18.79%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
21.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist
1.38%22.63%18.38%19.46%-12.82%15.35%3.10%24.61%-18.48%12.20%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
20.65%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.22%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between C001.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.59

The correlation between C001.DE and 6AQQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C001.DE
C001.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
C001.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C001.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
C001.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
C001.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
C001.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


C001.DE6AQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.42

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

3.77

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.59

11.17

-10.58

C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C001.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C001.DE and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


C001.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

2.41

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.94

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

1.08

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.08

-0.72

Drawdowns

C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C001.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.60%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C001.DE and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


C001.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.60%

-31.19%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-10.01%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

-26.73%

+10.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

-31.19%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.62%

-31.19%

-7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-0.84%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-5.36%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

3.39%

+0.58%

Volatility

C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 4.40%. This indicates that C001.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


C001.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

4.40%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

10.96%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.03%

15.66%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

19.83%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

19.63%

-1.39%

C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C001.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

C001.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while 6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist
1.99%2.02%2.17%3.04%2.72%1.91%2.36%2.52%3.10%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


C001.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, C001.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

C001.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

C001.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. C001.DE tracks DAX®, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for C001.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C001.DE and 6AQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer