BYND vs. GIS
BYND (Beyond Meat, Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 5 years, BYND returned -65.98%/yr vs -7.83%/yr for GIS. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BYND vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYND achieves a -16.91% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -23.47% return.
BYND
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -15.29%
- YTD
- -16.91%
- 6M
- -37.50%
- 1Y
- -78.44%
- 3Y*
- -63.44%
- 5Y*
- -65.98%
- 10Y*
- —
GIS
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- -23.47%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- -31.91%
- 3Y*
- -21.38%
- 5Y*
- -7.83%
- 10Y*
- -2.63%
BYND vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYND Beyond Meat, Inc. | -16.91% | -78.19% | -57.75% | -27.70% | -81.11% | -47.87% | 65.34% | 64.35% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -23.47% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYND and GIS is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
BYND:
$325.51M
GIS:
$18.72B
BYND:
$1.03
GIS:
$4.08
BYND:
0.66
GIS:
8.45
BYND:
0.52
GIS:
1.02
BYND:
4.35
GIS:
2.00
BYND:
$275.50M
GIS:
$18.37B
BYND:
$7.65M
GIS:
$4.70B
BYND:
-$290.85M
GIS:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYND vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
BYND
GIS
BYND vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BYND | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.77 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.91 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | -1.86 | +0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BYND vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYND drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYND and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYND | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.78% | -59.63% | -40.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.85% | -36.85% | -51.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.06% | -55.32% | -41.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.67% | -59.63% | -40.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.71% | -56.70% | -43.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.62% | -10.28% | -65.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.55% | 19.06% | +47.49% |
Volatility
BYND vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) has a higher volatility of 20.19% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.25%. This indicates that BYND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYND | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.19% | 6.25% | +13.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.70% | 18.81% | +56.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 236.92% | 23.96% | +212.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.82% | 21.14% | +105.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.26% | 22.10% | +95.16% |
Dividends
BYND vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
BYND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYND Beyond Meat, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.07% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
BYND vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Beyond Meat, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BYND and GIS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYND has higher volatility (20.19%) compared to GIS (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYND dropped -99.78% vs GIS's -59.63%.
BYND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYND and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer