PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYDDF vs. MRNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BYDDF vs. MRNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYDDF achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than MRNA's 69.24% return.


BYDDF

1D
0.54%
1M
-12.16%
YTD
-8.79%
6M
-10.23%
1Y
-34.03%
3Y*
1.99%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
20.79%

MRNA

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
69.24%
6M
69.42%
1Y
87.14%
3Y*
-26.94%
5Y*
-25.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYDDF vs. MRNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BYDDF
BYD Company Limited
-8.79%11.38%24.71%13.22%-27.71%28.77%432.27%-21.10%-10.84%
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
69.24%-29.08%-58.19%-44.63%-29.28%143.11%434.10%28.09%-30.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BYDDF and MRNA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BYDDF:

$100.93B

MRNA:

$19.71B

EPS

BYDDF:

CN¥3.05

MRNA:

-$8.16

PS Ratio

BYDDF:

0.86

MRNA:

8.78

PB Ratio

BYDDF:

2.74

MRNA:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

BYDDF:

CN¥783.83B

MRNA:

$2.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BYDDF:

CN¥132.11B

MRNA:

-$309.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

BYDDF:

CN¥68.89B

MRNA:

-$3.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYDDF vs. MRNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYDDF
BYDDF Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BYDDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYDDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYDDF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BYDDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYDDF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MRNA
MRNA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MRNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRNA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MRNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYDDF vs. MRNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYDDFMRNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.24

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.01

2.34

-3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.53

4.59

-6.12

BYDDF vs. MRNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYDDF Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the MRNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYDDF and MRNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYDDF vs. MRNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYDDF drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, smaller than the maximum MRNA drawdown of -95.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDF and MRNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYDDFMRNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.78%

-95.38%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.94%

-35.51%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.33%

-86.58%

+44.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.35%

-95.38%

+47.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.95%

-89.70%

+47.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.96%

-57.06%

+16.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.18%

18.06%

+6.12%

Volatility

BYDDF vs. MRNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) is 8.62%, while Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) has a volatility of 17.56%. This indicates that BYDDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYDDFMRNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

17.56%

-8.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.73%

48.82%

-22.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.63%

64.75%

-29.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.54%

66.49%

-20.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.10%

72.15%

-25.05%

Dividends

BYDDF vs. MRNA - Dividend Comparison

BYDDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while MRNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYDDF
BYD Company Limited
0.47%6.04%1.28%0.58%0.07%0.07%0.03%0.58%0.00%2.03%
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BYDDF vs. MRNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BYD Company Limited and Moderna, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B20222023202420252026
150.23B
389.00M
(BYDDF) Total Revenue
(MRNA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BYDDF values in CNY, MRNA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BYDDF and MRNA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRNA has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to BYDDF (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDDF dropped -86.78% vs MRNA's -95.38%.

MRNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYDDF and MRNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer