WHD vs. CCRN
WHD (Cactus, Inc.) and CCRN (Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.) are both stocks. WHD operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while CCRN operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, WHD returned 8.10%/yr vs -5.69%/yr for CCRN. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WHD vs. CCRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHD achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly lower than CCRN's 62.59% return.
WHD
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -12.70%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 21.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- —
CCRN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 62.59%
- 6M
- 65.45%
- 1Y
- -6.13%
- 3Y*
- -20.79%
- 5Y*
- -5.69%
- 10Y*
- -0.27%
WHD vs. CCRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHD Cactus, Inc. | 19.29% | -20.76% | 29.72% | -8.69% | 33.00% | 47.83% | -22.85% | 25.57% | 29.91% |
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 62.59% | -55.40% | -19.79% | -14.79% | -4.29% | 212.97% | -23.67% | 58.53% | -44.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHD and CCRN is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018 | 0.24 |
The correlation between WHD and CCRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WHD:
$3.74B
CCRN:
$414.46M
WHD:
$1.06
CCRN:
-$3.06
WHD:
3.16
CCRN:
0.56
WHD:
2.66
CCRN:
1.32
WHD:
$1.19B
CCRN:
$760.89M
WHD:
$485.56M
CCRN:
$138.12M
WHD:
$300.14M
CCRN:
$9.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHD vs. CCRN — Risk / Return Rank
WHD
CCRN
WHD vs. CCRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cactus, Inc. (WHD) and Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WHD | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.03 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | -0.13 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | -0.24 | +2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WHD vs. CCRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHD drawdown since its inception was -79.10%, smaller than the maximum CCRN drawdown of -90.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHD and CCRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHD | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.10% | -90.04% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.07% | -47.08% | +17.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.41% | -73.43% | +22.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.41% | -80.24% | +28.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.46% | -66.11% | +45.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.22% | -64.46% | +41.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.85% | 25.26% | -13.41% |
Volatility
WHD vs. CCRN - Volatility Comparison
Cactus, Inc. (WHD) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) at 0.84%. This indicates that WHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHD | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.35% | 0.84% | +9.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.85% | 33.60% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.86% | 55.58% | -14.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.57% | 60.02% | -15.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.62% | 56.88% | -4.26% |
Dividends
WHD vs. CCRN - Dividend Comparison
WHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while CCRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WHD Cactus, Inc. | 1.03% | 1.18% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.88% | 1.00% | 1.38% | 0.26% |
Financials
WHD vs. CCRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cactus, Inc. and Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WHD and CCRN have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WHD has higher volatility (10.35%) compared to CCRN (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHD dropped -79.10% vs CCRN's -90.04%.
WHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WHD and CCRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer