PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWEN vs. LC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BWEN vs. LC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) and LendingClub Corporation (LC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWEN achieves a 43.46% return, which is significantly higher than LC's -13.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BWEN has outperformed LC with an annualized return of -0.82%, while LC has yielded a comparatively lower -3.37% annualized return.


BWEN

1D
1.00%
1M
59.84%
YTD
43.46%
6M
28.48%
1Y
130.68%
3Y*
0.50%
5Y*
-2.76%
10Y*
-0.82%

LC

1D
-6.34%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
-13.46%
6M
-12.82%
1Y
56.69%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*
-3.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWEN vs. LC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWEN
Broadwind, Inc.
43.46%50.53%-32.13%54.75%-4.79%-76.29%377.71%27.69%-52.21%-32.76%
LC
LendingClub Corporation
-13.46%16.99%85.24%-0.68%-63.61%128.98%-16.32%-4.03%-36.32%-21.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BWEN and LC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2014

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWEN:

$94.75M

LC:

$1.92B

EPS

BWEN:

$0.22

LC:

$1.49

PE Ratio

BWEN:

18.37

LC:

10.97

PEG Ratio

BWEN:

0.07

LC:

0.03

PS Ratio

BWEN:

0.61

LC:

1.49

PB Ratio

BWEN:

1.43

LC:

1.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWEN:

$155.27M

LC:

$1.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWEN:

$16.34M

LC:

$872.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

BWEN:

$13.47M

LC:

$309.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWEN vs. LC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWEN
BWEN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BWEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWEN Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BWEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWEN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LC
LC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWEN vs. LC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) and LendingClub Corporation (LC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWENLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

1.03

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

1.65

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.21

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.49

+1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.98

3.39

+1.59

BWEN vs. LC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the LC Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWEN and LC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWENLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.03

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.01

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

-0.05

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

-0.25

+0.20

Drawdowns

BWEN vs. LC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWEN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, roughly equal to the maximum LC drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWEN and LC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWENLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.58%

-96.84%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.75%

-38.28%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.28%

-53.53%

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.18%

-89.48%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.79%

-89.48%

+1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.58%

-88.25%

-10.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.16%

-83.59%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.36%

16.79%

+9.57%

Volatility

BWEN vs. LC - Volatility Comparison

Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) has a higher volatility of 92.63% compared to LendingClub Corporation (LC) at 14.96%. This indicates that BWEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWENLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

92.63%

14.96%

+77.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

109.13%

41.04%

+68.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.42%

55.28%

+95.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.68%

65.14%

+40.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.26%

63.15%

+29.11%

Dividends

BWEN vs. LC - Dividend Comparison

Neither BWEN nor LC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BWEN vs. LC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadwind, Inc. and LendingClub Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
34.06M
261.21M
(BWEN) Total Revenue
(LC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BWEN vs. LC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadwind, Inc. and LendingClub Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
13.8%
68.0%
Portfolio components
BWEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadwind, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.69M and revenue of 34.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.

LC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LendingClub Corporation reported a gross profit of 177.54M and revenue of 261.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.

BWEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadwind, Inc. reported an operating income of 389.00K and revenue of 34.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

LC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LendingClub Corporation reported an operating income of 122.12M and revenue of 261.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.8%.

BWEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadwind, Inc. reported a net income of -495.00K and revenue of 34.06M, resulting in a net margin of -1.5%.

LC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LendingClub Corporation reported a net income of 51.60M and revenue of 261.21M, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BWEN and LC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWEN has higher volatility (92.63%) compared to LC (14.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWEN dropped -99.58% vs LC's -96.84%.

LC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWEN and LC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer