PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWEN vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BWEN vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWEN achieves a 41.34% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 6.90% return.


BWEN

1D
2.56%
1M
-12.66%
6M
33.33%
YTD
41.34%
1Y
58.73%
3Y*
1.72%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
-1.08%
ALL TIME*
-4.97%

QQQI

1D
0.68%
1M
-3.08%
6M
5.69%
YTD
6.90%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.77M$2.32M$4.08M
$341.25M$334.46M$358.36M

BWEN vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BWEN
Broadwind, Inc.
41.34%50.53%-22.63%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
6.90%18.62%19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BWEN and QQQI is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWEN vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BWEN
BWEN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BWEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWEN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BWEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWEN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BWEN vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BWENQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.67

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

6.03

-3.94

BWEN vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWEN and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BWEN vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWEN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWEN and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWENQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.58%

-20.00%

-79.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.75%

-9.61%

-41.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.60%

-5.92%

-92.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.27%

-2.27%

-79.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.12%

2.67%

+23.45%

Volatility

BWEN vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) has a higher volatility of 37.53% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.53%. This indicates that BWEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWENQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.53%

6.53%

+31.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

114.49%

13.66%

+100.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

153.69%

16.35%

+137.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.25%

17.75%

+89.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.24%

17.75%

+75.49%

Dividends

BWEN vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

BWEN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.38%.


PositionTTM20252024
BWEN
Broadwind, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.38%13.82%12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


BWEN and QQQI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWEN has higher volatility (37.53%) compared to QQQI (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWEN dropped -99.58% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWEN and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer