BUZZ vs. ILCB
BUZZ (VanEck Social Sentiment ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - BUZZ tracks the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUZZ returned 9.80%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for ILCB. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
BUZZ vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly higher than ILCB's 11.12% return.
BUZZ
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- 14.04%
- YTD
- 22.01%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 44.51%
- 3Y*
- 36.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
BUZZ vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF | 22.01% | 30.61% | 33.74% | 54.64% | -47.67% | -0.89% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 26.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUZZ and ILCB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between BUZZ and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
BUZZ vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUZZ
ILCB
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
BUZZ
ILCB
Communication Services
BUZZ
ILCB
Financial Services
BUZZ
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
BUZZ
ILCB
Industrials
BUZZ
ILCB
Healthcare
BUZZ
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
BUZZ
ILCB
Utilities
BUZZ
ILCB
Energy
BUZZ
ILCB
Basic Materials
BUZZ
ILCB
Real Estate
BUZZ
-
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUZZ vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
BUZZ
ILCB
BUZZ vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUZZ | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 3.10 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 14.24 | -10.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUZZ | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 2.35 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.79 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.64 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
BUZZ vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUZZ | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.87% | -51.53% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.47% | -9.09% | -21.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -19.05% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.87% | -25.47% | -31.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -0.67% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -6.24% | -17.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.55% | 1.97% | +10.58% |
Volatility
BUZZ vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that BUZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUZZ | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 2.88% | +6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.67% | 9.10% | +14.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.35% | 12.02% | +19.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 17.13% | +15.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 18.16% | +14.53% |
BUZZ vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUZZ vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUZZ and ILCB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUZZ has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 13.45% vs 9.80% for BUZZ. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BUZZ.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for BUZZ.
BUZZ tracks BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUZZ and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer