PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUZZ vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUZZ vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 22.04% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -27.34% return.


BUZZ

1D
0.03%
1M
12.16%
YTD
22.04%
6M
13.06%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
36.50%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*

HODL

1D
-2.76%
1M
-22.17%
YTD
-27.34%
6M
-31.31%
1Y
-39.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
22.04%30.61%39.17%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-27.34%-6.42%99.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and HODL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.57

The correlation between BUZZ and HODL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ
BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUZZHODLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.86

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

-0.80

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

-1.39

+4.89

BUZZ vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUZZHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

-0.91

+2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.28

+0.05

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than HODL's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and HODL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUZZHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-49.37%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.47%

-49.37%

+18.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-49.37%

+46.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-16.03%

-7.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.55%

28.52%

-15.97%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) have volatilities of 9.31% and 9.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUZZHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.31%

9.05%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.66%

33.85%

-10.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.33%

43.55%

-12.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.97%

49.88%

-16.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.68%

49.88%

-17.20%

BUZZ vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUZZ vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUZZ nor HODL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.52%0.40%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUZZ and HODL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUZZ has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to HODL (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs HODL's -49.37%.

On 1-year performance, BUZZ leads with 43.81% vs -39.52% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HODL has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUZZ has performed better with a 43.81% return vs -39.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BUZZ.

BUZZ and HODL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BUZZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. BUZZ tracks BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.25% for HODL.

BUZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUZZ and HODL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer