BUYZ vs. SGRT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

BUYZ vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -11.76% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 26.83% return.

BUYZ

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 2.92%
• 6M: -11.08%
• YTD: -11.76%
• 1Y: -12.72%
• 3Y*: 9.03%
• 5Y*: -7.03%
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: -4.23%
• 1M: -13.29%
• 6M: 20.02%
• YTD: 26.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUYZ vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	-11.76%	-4.14%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	26.83%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYZ and SGRT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

BUYZ vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUYZ

BUYZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
BUYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BUYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUYZ vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUYZ	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.74	—	—

Drawdowns

BUYZ vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUYZ	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.04%	-17.87%	-50.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.05%	-17.46%	-25.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.85%	-3.66%	-35.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUYZ	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.79%	37.05%	-14.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.25%	37.05%	-9.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.81%	37.05%	-7.24%

BUYZ vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUYZ vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	0.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUYZ and SGRT in my portfolio?

BUYZ and SGRT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BUYZ or SGRT?

On fees, BUYZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUYZ or SGRT?

BUYZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUYZ or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.

What is the main difference between BUYZ and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.59% for SGRT.