BUYZ vs. QWLD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BUYZ is actively managed, while QWLD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUYZ returned -7.10%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for QWLD. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.

Performance

BUYZ vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -10.19% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 11.57% return.

BUYZ

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 2.85%
• 6M: 0.22%
• YTD: -10.19%
• 1Y: -12.12%
• 3Y*: 11.06%
• 5Y*: -7.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.84%

QWLD

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 3.65%
• 6M: 7.82%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 1Y: 19.98%
• 3Y*: 16.97%
• 5Y*: 10.27%
• 10Y*: 11.79%
• ALL TIME*: 10.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	$13.78K	$15.43K	$16.35K
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	$271.51K	$292.32K	$1.06M

BUYZ vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	-10.19%	8.70%	28.25%	39.13%	-49.81%	-19.38%	117.10%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	11.57%	17.93%	14.44%	19.59%	-13.30%	21.57%	17.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYZ and QWLD is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.66

The correlation between BUYZ and QWLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUYZ vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUYZ	QWLD
Consumer Cyclical	40.0%	6.3%
Communication Services	22.3%	9.5%
Technology	15.2%	24.9%
Financial Services	9.0%	16.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	8.1%
Industrials	5.3%	10.9%
Real Estate	2.5%	1.0%
Healthcare	0.7%	13.2%
Basic Materials	-	2.5%
Energy	-	3.4%
Utilities	-	3.8%

Return for Risk

BUYZ vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUYZ

BUYZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
BUYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BUYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QWLD

QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 77
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUYZ vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUYZ	QWLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	2.07	-2.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.58	2.93	-3.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.37	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	2.62	-3.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.68	11.45	-12.13

BUYZ vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUYZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUYZ and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUYZ vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than QWLD's maximum drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and QWLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUYZ	QWLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.04%	-31.89%	-36.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.85%	-7.66%	-23.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.85%	-12.40%	-18.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.04%	-22.84%	-40.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.03%	0.00%	-42.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.89%	-3.66%	-35.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.88%	1.75%	+16.13%

Volatility

BUYZ vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.60%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUYZ	QWLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.54%	2.60%	+3.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.14%	7.78%	+10.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.25%	9.77%	+13.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.28%	13.52%	+13.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.78%	15.13%	+14.65%

BUYZ vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUYZ vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	1.75%	1.85%	1.74%	1.78%	2.02%	1.77%	1.77%	2.13%	2.33%	2.73%	2.22%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUYZ and QWLD in my portfolio?

BUYZ and QWLD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUYZ or QWLD?

BUYZ has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to QWLD (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

Which ETF is better, BUYZ or QWLD?

On 5-year performance, QWLD leads with 10.27% vs -7.10% for BUYZ. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUYZ or QWLD?

Over the 5-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 10.27% return vs -7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUYZ or QWLD?

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUYZ or QWLD?

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.

What is the main difference between BUYZ and QWLD?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.30% for QWLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.