BUYZ vs. LVHI
BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. BUYZ is actively managed, while LVHI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUYZ returned -6.77%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
BUYZ vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 12.09% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -14.51%
- 6M
- -15.65%
- 1Y
- -13.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- -6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 13.88%
- 1Y
- 30.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- —
BUYZ vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -14.51% | 8.70% | 28.25% | 39.13% | -49.81% | -19.38% | 111.45% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 12.09% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and LVHI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BUYZ and LVHI has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BUYZ vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUYZ
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUYZ
LVHI
Communication Services
BUYZ
LVHI
Technology
BUYZ
LVHI
Financial Services
BUYZ
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
BUYZ
LVHI
Industrials
BUYZ
LVHI
Real Estate
BUYZ
LVHI
Healthcare
BUYZ
LVHI
Basic Materials
BUYZ
-
LVHI
Energy
BUYZ
-
LVHI
Utilities
BUYZ
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
LVHI
BUYZ vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUYZ | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.62 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 5.10 | -5.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 21.22 | -22.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUYZ | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 3.28 | -3.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 1.44 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.82 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -32.31% | -35.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -6.08% | -24.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.85% | -11.99% | -18.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.32% | -11.99% | -51.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.82% | -1.23% | -43.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -3.52% | -35.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.20% | 1.46% | +13.74% |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.89%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 2.89% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.15% | 7.50% | +9.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.22% | 9.45% | +12.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 11.06% | +16.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.91% | 13.76% | +16.15% |
BUYZ vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 6.10% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYZ and LVHI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUYZ has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to LVHI (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.88% vs -6.77% for BUYZ. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.88% return vs -6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.
BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUYZ and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer