PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUYZ vs. IOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUYZ vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 12.77% return.


BUYZ

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-14.51%
6M
-15.65%
1Y
-13.45%
3Y*
11.23%
5Y*
-6.77%
10Y*

IOO

1D
0.45%
1M
4.62%
YTD
12.77%
6M
13.23%
1Y
38.40%
3Y*
25.74%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
16.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUYZ vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BUYZ
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
-14.51%8.70%28.25%39.13%-49.81%-19.38%111.45%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
12.77%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYZ and IOO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.70

The correlation between BUYZ and IOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUYZ vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUYZ
IOO

Consumer Cyclical

41.0%
8.4%

Communication Services

21.9%
11.0%

Technology

15.9%
46.2%

Financial Services

7.8%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
5.6%

Industrials

4.7%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.2%

Healthcare

0.7%
8.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Energy

-

3.6%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BUYZ
41.0%
IOO
8.4%

Communication Services

BUYZ
21.9%
IOO
11.0%

Technology

BUYZ
15.9%
IOO
46.2%

Financial Services

BUYZ
7.8%
IOO
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

BUYZ
6.1%
IOO
5.6%

Industrials

BUYZ
4.7%
IOO
4.8%

Real Estate

BUYZ
2.5%
IOO
0.2%

Healthcare

BUYZ
0.7%
IOO
8.4%

Basic Materials

BUYZ

-

IOO
1.7%

Energy

BUYZ

-

IOO
3.6%

Utilities

BUYZ

-

IOO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUYZ vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUYZ
BUYZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BUYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUYZ vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUYZIOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.51

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

3.88

-4.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

18.01

-18.90

BUYZ vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUYZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUYZ and IOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUYZIOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

2.85

-3.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.99

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.39

-0.20

Drawdowns

BUYZ vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and IOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUYZIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.04%

-55.85%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.85%

-9.94%

-20.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.85%

-19.19%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.32%

-23.52%

-39.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.82%

-0.88%

-43.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.76%

-11.27%

-27.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.20%

2.14%

+13.06%

Volatility

BUYZ vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 3.70%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUYZIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

3.70%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.15%

10.59%

+6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.22%

13.54%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.17%

17.04%

+10.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.91%

17.77%

+12.14%

BUYZ vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUYZ vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUYZ
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
0.00%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.81%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUYZ and IOO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUYZ has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to IOO (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs IOO's -55.85%.

On 5-year performance, IOO leads with 16.78% vs -6.77% for BUYZ. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.78% return vs -6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.

IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.

BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.40% for IOO.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUYZ and IOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer