BUYZ vs. IOO
BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). BUYZ is actively managed, while IOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUYZ returned -6.77%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for IOO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IOO.
Performance
BUYZ vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 12.77% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -14.51%
- 6M
- -15.65%
- 1Y
- -13.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- -6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
IOO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 12.77%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 38.40%
- 3Y*
- 25.74%
- 5Y*
- 16.78%
- 10Y*
- 16.67%
BUYZ vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -14.51% | 8.70% | 28.25% | 39.13% | -49.81% | -19.38% | 111.45% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 12.77% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 29.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and IOO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BUYZ and IOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUYZ vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUYZ
IOO
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUYZ
IOO
Communication Services
BUYZ
IOO
Technology
BUYZ
IOO
Financial Services
BUYZ
IOO
Consumer Defensive
BUYZ
IOO
Industrials
BUYZ
IOO
Real Estate
BUYZ
IOO
Healthcare
BUYZ
IOO
Basic Materials
BUYZ
-
IOO
Energy
BUYZ
-
IOO
Utilities
BUYZ
-
IOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
IOO
BUYZ vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUYZ | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.51 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 3.88 | -4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 18.01 | -18.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUYZ | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 2.85 | -3.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 0.99 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.39 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and IOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -55.85% | -12.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -9.94% | -20.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.85% | -19.19% | -11.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.32% | -23.52% | -39.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.82% | -0.88% | -43.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -11.27% | -27.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.20% | 2.14% | +13.06% |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 3.70%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 3.70% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.15% | 10.59% | +6.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.22% | 13.54% | +8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 17.04% | +10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.91% | 17.77% | +12.14% |
BUYZ vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.81% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYZ and IOO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUYZ has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to IOO (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs IOO's -55.85%.
On 5-year performance, IOO leads with 16.78% vs -6.77% for BUYZ. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.78% return vs -6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.
IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.
BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.40% for IOO.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUYZ and IOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer