BUYZ vs. IBIC
BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. BUYZ is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, BUYZ returned -13.69% vs 4.38% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
BUYZ vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -17.25% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.39% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -17.25%
- 6M
- -18.73%
- 1Y
- -13.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- -8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUYZ vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -17.25% | 8.70% | 28.25% | 11.51% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.39% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and IBIC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.04 |
The correlation between BUYZ and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
IBIC
BUYZ vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUYZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 2.21 | -1.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 16.41 | -16.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 58.11 | -58.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -0.90% | -67.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -0.27% | -30.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.59% | -0.11% | -46.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.79% | -0.10% | -38.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 0.08% | +15.98% |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 0.16% | +6.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.86% | 0.67% | +17.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.74% | 0.89% | +21.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.22% | 1.57% | +25.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 1.57% | +28.33% |
BUYZ vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYZ and IBIC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUYZ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.38% vs -13.69% for BUYZ. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.38% return vs -13.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.
BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUYZ and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer