PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUYZ vs. AVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUYZ vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 15.06% return.


BUYZ

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-14.51%
6M
-15.65%
1Y
-13.45%
3Y*
11.23%
5Y*
-6.77%
10Y*

AVUS

1D
0.56%
1M
4.25%
YTD
15.06%
6M
15.18%
1Y
33.34%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUYZ vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BUYZ
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
-14.51%8.70%28.25%39.13%-49.81%-19.38%111.45%
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
15.06%16.68%20.43%21.77%-13.82%28.73%30.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYZ and AVUS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.70

The correlation between BUYZ and AVUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUYZ vs. AVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUYZ
AVUS

Consumer Cyclical

41.0%
11.8%

Communication Services

21.9%
9.8%

Technology

15.9%
27.5%

Financial Services

7.8%
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
4.4%

Industrials

4.7%
11.5%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.2%

Healthcare

0.7%
7.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.7%

Energy

-

7.4%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BUYZ
41.0%
AVUS
11.8%

Communication Services

BUYZ
21.9%
AVUS
9.8%

Technology

BUYZ
15.9%
AVUS
27.5%

Financial Services

BUYZ
7.8%
AVUS
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

BUYZ
6.1%
AVUS
4.4%

Industrials

BUYZ
4.7%
AVUS
11.5%

Real Estate

BUYZ
2.5%
AVUS
0.2%

Healthcare

BUYZ
0.7%
AVUS
7.1%

Basic Materials

BUYZ

-

AVUS
2.7%

Energy

BUYZ

-

AVUS
7.4%

Utilities

BUYZ

-

AVUS
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUYZ vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUYZ
BUYZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BUYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUYZ vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUYZAVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.50

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

4.27

-4.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

19.43

-20.31

BUYZ vs. AVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUYZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the AVUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUYZ and AVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUYZAVUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

2.76

-3.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.77

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.80

-0.61

Drawdowns

BUYZ vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than AVUS's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and AVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUYZAVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.04%

-37.04%

-31.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.85%

-7.85%

-23.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.85%

-19.74%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.32%

-22.19%

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.82%

0.00%

-44.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.76%

-5.09%

-33.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.20%

1.72%

+13.48%

Volatility

BUYZ vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) at 2.87%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUYZAVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

2.87%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.15%

9.01%

+8.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.22%

12.14%

+10.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.17%

17.29%

+9.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.91%

20.84%

+9.07%

BUYZ vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUYZ vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison

BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
0.90%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%
BUYZ
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
0.00%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUYZ and AVUS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUYZ has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to AVUS (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs AVUS's -37.04%.

On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.16% vs -6.77% for BUYZ. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.16% return vs -6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.

AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.

BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.15% for AVUS.

AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUYZ and AVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer