AVUS vs. DFAU
AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) and DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUS returned 13.29%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for DFAU. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DFAU.
Performance
AVUS vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUS achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than DFAU's 12.07% return.
AVUS
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 34.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 30.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.95% | 16.68% | 20.43% | 21.77% | -13.82% | 28.73% | 6.82% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 12.07% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -16.99% | 26.89% | 6.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUS and DFAU is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between AVUS and DFAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUS vs. DFAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUS
DFAU
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVUS
DFAU
Financial Services
AVUS
DFAU
Consumer Cyclical
AVUS
DFAU
Industrials
AVUS
DFAU
Communication Services
AVUS
DFAU
Energy
AVUS
DFAU
Healthcare
AVUS
DFAU
Consumer Defensive
AVUS
DFAU
Basic Materials
AVUS
DFAU
Utilities
AVUS
DFAU
Real Estate
AVUS
DFAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUS vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank
AVUS
DFAU
AVUS vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUS | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.82 | 2.53 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.83 | 3.43 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.46 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 3.56 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.10 | 16.33 | +3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUS | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 2.53 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.95 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
AVUS vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than DFAU's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and DFAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUS | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -23.61% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -8.67% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -19.36% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -23.61% | +1.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -4.99% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.89% | -0.17% |
Volatility
AVUS vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUS | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.88% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.99% | 9.02% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 12.04% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 17.02% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 16.74% | +4.11% |
AVUS vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVUS vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison
AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than DFAU's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.89% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, AVUS and DFAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVUS has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to DFAU (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs DFAU's -23.61%.
On 5-year performance, DFAU leads with 13.38% vs 13.29% for AVUS. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUS.
AVUS and DFAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.90%.
AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DFAU is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUS and 0.12% for DFAU.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUS and DFAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer