BUXX vs. FLTR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BUXX (Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUXX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Strive, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. BUXX is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. Over the past year, BUXX returned 4.30% vs 5.21% for FLTR. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUXX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.

Performance

BUXX vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUXX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.11% return.

BUXX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 6.13%
• 5Y*: 4.52%
• 10Y*: 3.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUXX vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BUXX Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF	1.81%	4.84%	6.18%	2.86%
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	2.11%	5.22%	7.38%	2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BUXX and FLTR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2023	0.03

Return for Risk

BUXX vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUXX

BUXX Risk / Return Rank: 97
BUXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
BUXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BUXX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BUXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
BUXX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUXX vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUXX	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.49	6.52	-3.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.75	12.09	-6.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.84	3.02	-1.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.68	16.69	-2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	58.03	97.81	-39.78

BUXX vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUXX Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is lower than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUXX and FLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUXX vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUXX drawdown since its inception was -0.60%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUXX and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUXX	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-17.84%	+17.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.29%	-0.31%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.08%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-0.67%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	0.05%	+0.02%

Volatility

BUXX vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX) has a higher volatility of 0.42% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.29%. This indicates that BUXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUXX	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	0.29%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.79%	0.65%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24%	0.80%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.46%	2.13%	-0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.46%	5.00%	-3.54%

BUXX vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUXX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BUXX vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

BUXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, which matches FLTR's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUXX Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF	4.72%	4.95%	5.55%	1.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	4.72%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUXX and FLTR in my portfolio?

BUXX and FLTR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUXX or FLTR?

BUXX has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to FLTR (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUXX dropped -0.60% vs FLTR's -17.84%.

Which ETF is better, BUXX or FLTR?

On 1-year performance, FLTR leads with 5.21% vs 4.30% for BUXX. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUXX or FLTR?

Over the 1-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 5.21% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUXX or FLTR?

FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for BUXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUXX or FLTR?

BUXX and FLTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 4.72%.

What is the main difference between BUXX and FLTR?

BUXX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Strive and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for BUXX and 0.14% for FLTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.52 vs 3.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.