BULZ vs. PHYL
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL).
BULZ and PHYL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021. PHYL is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Sep 24, 2018.
Performance
BULZ vs. PHYL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BULZ vs. PHYL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN | -32.23% | 60.09% | 54.09% | 394.22% | -92.26% | 12.62% |
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | -0.69% | 9.65% | 8.45% | 11.91% | -11.80% | 2.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a -32.23% return, which is significantly lower than PHYL's -0.69% return.
BULZ
- 1D
- 15.12%
- 1M
- -15.60%
- YTD
- -32.23%
- 6M
- -31.80%
- 1Y
- 68.79%
- 3Y*
- 56.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHYL
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 7.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BULZ vs. PHYL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PHYL's 0.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BULZ vs. PHYL — Risk / Return Rank
BULZ
PHYL
BULZ vs. PHYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULZ | PHYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 1.68 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.35 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.39 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.95 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 9.37 | -6.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULZ | PHYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.68 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.69 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between BULZ and PHYL is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BULZ vs. PHYL - Dividend Comparison
BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 7.88% | 7.05% | 8.28% | 7.62% | 6.55% | 6.13% | 7.51% | 7.31% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
BULZ vs. PHYL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than PHYL's maximum drawdown of -22.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and PHYL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULZ | PHYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -22.07% | -72.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.22% | -3.80% | -50.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.18% | -1.76% | -47.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.16% | -3.13% | -57.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.05% | 0.79% | +19.26% |
Volatility
BULZ vs. PHYL - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a higher volatility of 28.82% compared to PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) at 1.88%. This indicates that BULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BULZ | PHYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.82% | 1.88% | +26.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.39% | 2.50% | +57.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.38% | 4.46% | +87.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.57% | 5.66% | +85.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.57% | 7.73% | +83.84% |