BULD vs. UNL
BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) and UNL (United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BULD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while UNL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Natural Gas. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULD returned 16.27%/yr vs -18.22%/yr for UNL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. BULD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UNL.
Performance
BULD vs. UNL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 33.10% return, which is significantly higher than UNL's -18.43% return.
BULD
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- 16.77%
- YTD
- 33.10%
- 1Y
- 51.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNL
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- 6M
- -8.23%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 1Y
- -32.89%
- 3Y*
- -18.22%
- 5Y*
- -9.93%
- 10Y*
- -5.27%
BULD vs. UNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 33.10% | 23.20% | -3.93% | 28.27% | -12.41% |
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | -18.43% | -9.67% | -4.78% | -50.20% | -32.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULD and UNL is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BULD and UNL has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULD vs. UNL — Risk / Return Rank
BULD
UNL
BULD vs. UNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BULD | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.84 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | -1.02 | +4.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | -1.70 | +11.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BULD vs. UNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum UNL drawdown of -89.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and UNL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULD | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.64% | -89.34% | +61.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -32.44% | +16.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.64% | -49.75% | +22.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -78.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.78% | -89.34% | +79.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -73.45% | +65.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 19.97% | -14.75% |
Volatility
BULD vs. UNL - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) at 5.62%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULD | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.08% | 5.62% | +6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.95% | 28.58% | -3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.02% | 35.05% | -4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.29% | 41.75% | -13.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.29% | 33.82% | -5.53% |
BULD vs. UNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UNL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BULD vs. UNL - Dividend Comparison
BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while UNL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 0.86% | 1.24% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.08% |
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BULD and UNL have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BULD has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to UNL (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULD dropped -27.64% vs UNL's -89.34%.
On 3-year performance, BULD leads with 16.27% vs -18.22% for UNL. On fees, BULD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, UNL has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BULD has performed better with a 16.27% return vs -18.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BULD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for UNL.
BULD has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for UNL.
BULD is categorized as Technology Equities, while UNL is Oil & Gas. BULD tracks BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index, while UNL tracks 12 Month Natural Gas. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BULD and 0.90% for UNL.
BULD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BULD and UNL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer