UNL vs. BNO
Compare and contrast key facts about United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO).
UNL and BNO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UNL is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the 12 Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Nov 18, 2009. BNO is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. It was launched on Jun 2, 2010. Both UNL and BNO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UNL or BNO.
Correlation
The correlation between UNL and BNO is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UNL vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UNL:
0.12
BNO:
-0.50
UNL:
0.42
BNO:
-0.55
UNL:
1.05
BNO:
0.93
UNL:
0.05
BNO:
-0.31
UNL:
0.28
BNO:
-1.44
UNL:
15.34%
BNO:
9.71%
UNL:
34.67%
BNO:
27.74%
UNL:
-88.01%
BNO:
-87.06%
UNL:
-85.24%
BNO:
-39.94%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNL achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than BNO's -6.84% return. Over the past 10 years, UNL has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of -3.60%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 1.73% annualized return.
UNL
3.06%
-14.43%
12.72%
6.85%
-0.00%
-3.60%
BNO
-6.84%
-8.31%
-7.09%
-14.63%
33.39%
1.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNL vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UNL and BNO have an expense ratio of 0.90%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UNL vs. BNO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UNL
BNO
UNL vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UNL vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNL nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UNL vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNL drawdown since its inception was -88.01%, roughly equal to the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNL and BNO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UNL vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) have volatilities of 13.58% and 13.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.