UNL vs. UNG
Compare and contrast key facts about United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG).
UNL and UNG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UNL is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the 12 Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Nov 18, 2009. UNG is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Apr 18, 2007. Both UNL and UNG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UNL or UNG.
Correlation
The correlation between UNL and UNG is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UNL vs. UNG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UNL:
0.12
UNG:
0.03
UNL:
0.42
UNG:
0.49
UNL:
1.05
UNG:
1.05
UNL:
0.05
UNG:
0.02
UNL:
0.28
UNG:
0.06
UNL:
15.34%
UNG:
25.98%
UNL:
34.67%
UNG:
61.33%
UNL:
-88.01%
UNG:
-99.85%
UNL:
-85.24%
UNG:
-99.81%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNL achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than UNG's -6.60% return. Over the past 10 years, UNL has outperformed UNG with an annualized return of -3.75%, while UNG has yielded a comparatively lower -22.69% annualized return.
UNL
3.06%
-14.95%
12.72%
7.95%
-0.27%
-3.75%
UNG
-6.60%
-23.08%
8.65%
11.66%
-21.67%
-22.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNL vs. UNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than UNG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UNL vs. UNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UNL
UNG
UNL vs. UNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UNL vs. UNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNL nor UNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UNL vs. UNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNL drawdown since its inception was -88.01%, smaller than the maximum UNG drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNL and UNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UNL vs. UNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) is 13.58%, while United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a volatility of 17.48%. This indicates that UNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.