BULD vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
BULD and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BULD is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Robotics & 3D Printing Index. It was launched on May 4, 2022. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both BULD and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BULD vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BULD vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 5.95% | 23.20% | -3.93% | 28.27% | -12.41% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 3.91% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | -4.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULD achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 3.91% return.
BULD
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 39.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BULD vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BULD vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
BULD
COWZ
BULD vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULD | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.96 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 1.43 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.21 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 1.20 | +1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 5.59 | +2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULD | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.96 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.63 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between BULD and COWZ is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BULD vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
BULD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than COWZ's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF | 1.17% | 1.24% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.07% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
BULD vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULD drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULD and COWZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULD | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.64% | -38.63% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -13.55% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -3.72% | -6.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -4.85% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 2.92% | +2.10% |
Volatility
BULD vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) has a higher volatility of 10.27% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.96%. This indicates that BULD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BULD | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.27% | 2.96% | +7.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.23% | 8.37% | +13.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.95% | 17.50% | +12.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 17.73% | +9.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 20.08% | +7.54% |