BUL vs. IWY
BUL (Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, while IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUL returned 11.26%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for IWY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWY.
Performance
BUL vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUL achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 7.20% return.
BUL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- —
IWY
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 26.69%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
BUL vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 9.02% | 19.18% | 27.39% | 3.68% | -16.18% | 32.48% | 27.26% | 4.81% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 7.20% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 12.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUL and IWY is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between BUL and IWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUL vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUL
IWY
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BUL
IWY
Consumer Cyclical
BUL
IWY
Healthcare
BUL
IWY
Industrials
BUL
IWY
Basic Materials
BUL
IWY
Energy
BUL
IWY
Consumer Defensive
BUL
IWY
Communication Services
BUL
IWY
Financial Services
BUL
-
IWY
Real Estate
BUL
-
IWY
Utilities
BUL
-
IWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUL vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
BUL
IWY
BUL vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUL | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 1.61 | +1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 5.26 | +5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUL | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.73 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.77 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.92 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
BUL vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and IWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUL | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -32.68% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -16.63% | +7.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | -23.22% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.85% | -32.68% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.82% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -4.75% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 5.09% | -2.63% |
Volatility
BUL vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 3.69%. This indicates that BUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUL | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 3.69% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.88% | 11.65% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 15.54% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 21.48% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 20.97% | +3.28% |
BUL vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUL vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than IWY's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 0.23% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 2.11% | 0.67% | 0.08% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUL and IWY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUL has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to IWY (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUL dropped -37.08% vs IWY's -32.68%.
On 5-year performance, IWY leads with 16.45% vs 11.26% for BUL. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWY has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BUL.
IWY has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.23% for BUL.
BUL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. BUL tracks Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BUL and 0.20% for IWY.
IWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUL and IWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer