BUL vs. IWY
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY).
BUL and IWY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUL is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer Cash Cows Growth Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. IWY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. Both BUL and IWY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BUL or IWY.
Correlation
The correlation between BUL and IWY is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BUL vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BUL:
1.83
IWY:
2.15
BUL:
2.48
IWY:
2.77
BUL:
1.30
IWY:
1.39
BUL:
1.88
IWY:
2.76
BUL:
11.99
IWY:
10.40
BUL:
2.71%
IWY:
3.67%
BUL:
17.74%
IWY:
17.74%
BUL:
-37.08%
IWY:
-32.68%
BUL:
-6.98%
IWY:
-2.56%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUL achieves a 29.12% return, which is significantly lower than IWY's 36.57% return.
BUL
29.12%
-1.18%
10.52%
30.31%
13.58%
N/A
IWY
36.57%
4.38%
11.51%
36.75%
20.82%
17.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUL vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BUL vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BUL vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than IWY's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 0.73% | 2.11% | 0.66% | 0.08% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.44% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
BUL vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and IWY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BUL vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 4.98%. This indicates that BUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.