PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUL vs. IWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUL vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUL achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 7.20% return.


BUL

1D
0.04%
1M
5.95%
YTD
9.02%
6M
10.73%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
22.33%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*

IWY

1D
-1.41%
1M
5.83%
YTD
7.20%
6M
6.65%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
19.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUL vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
9.02%19.18%27.39%3.68%-16.18%32.48%27.26%4.81%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
7.20%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BUL and IWY is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019

0.72

The correlation between BUL and IWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUL vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUL
IWY

Technology

28.3%
54.9%

Consumer Cyclical

22.3%
11.4%

Healthcare

21.4%
6.6%

Industrials

13.4%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.7%
0.3%

Energy

5.1%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
3.0%

Communication Services

1.6%
13.9%

Financial Services

-

5.6%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Technology

BUL
28.3%
IWY
54.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BUL
22.3%
IWY
11.4%

Healthcare

BUL
21.4%
IWY
6.6%

Industrials

BUL
13.4%
IWY
4.0%

Basic Materials

BUL
5.7%
IWY
0.3%

Energy

BUL
5.1%
IWY
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

BUL
2.3%
IWY
3.0%

Communication Services

BUL
1.6%
IWY
13.9%

Financial Services

BUL

-

IWY
5.6%

Real Estate

BUL

-

IWY
0.3%

Utilities

BUL

-

IWY
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUL vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUL
BUL Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUL Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUL vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BULIWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

1.61

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

5.26

+5.23

BUL vs. IWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the IWY Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUL and IWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BULIWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.77

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.92

-0.34

Drawdowns

BUL vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and IWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BULIWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-32.68%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-16.63%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

-23.22%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.85%

-32.68%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.82%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-4.75%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

5.09%

-2.63%

Volatility

BUL vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 3.69%. This indicates that BUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BULIWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

3.69%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

11.65%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

15.54%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.79%

21.48%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.25%

20.97%

+3.28%

BUL vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUL vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than IWY's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
0.23%0.28%0.30%2.11%0.67%0.08%0.69%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.33%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUL and IWY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUL has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to IWY (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUL dropped -37.08% vs IWY's -32.68%.

On 5-year performance, IWY leads with 16.45% vs 11.26% for BUL. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWY has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BUL.

IWY has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.23% for BUL.

BUL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. BUL tracks Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BUL and 0.20% for IWY.

IWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUL and IWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer