BUL vs. TMFC
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC).
BUL and TMFC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUL is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer Cash Cows Growth Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. TMFC is a passively managed fund by Motley Fool that tracks the performance of the Motley Fool 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2018. Both BUL and TMFC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BUL or TMFC.
Key characteristics
| BUL | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 32.70% | 33.91% |
| 1Y Return | 41.42% | 43.68% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.06% | 11.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.19% | 20.72% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.44 | 2.80 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.25 | 3.68 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.19 | 3.84 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.51 | 16.39 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.52% | 2.65% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.08% | 15.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.08% | -33.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.08% | -0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUL and TMFC is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BUL vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BUL having a 32.70% return and TMFC slightly higher at 33.91%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUL vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BUL vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BUL vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison
BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than TMFC's 0.10% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 0.71% | 2.11% | 0.66% | 0.08% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
BUL vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and TMFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BUL vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) is 4.48%, while Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that BUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.