PortfoliosLab logo
BUL vs. TMFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BUL and TMFC is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

BUL vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
85.20%
154.85%
BUL
TMFC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BUL:

0.34

TMFC:

0.81

Sortino Ratio

BUL:

0.65

TMFC:

1.24

Omega Ratio

BUL:

1.08

TMFC:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

BUL:

0.35

TMFC:

0.90

Martin Ratio

BUL:

1.25

TMFC:

3.36

Ulcer Index

BUL:

6.59%

TMFC:

5.39%

Daily Std Dev

BUL:

24.44%

TMFC:

22.53%

Max Drawdown

BUL:

-37.08%

TMFC:

-33.06%

Current Drawdown

BUL:

-13.12%

TMFC:

-9.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUL achieves a -5.33% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's -6.45% return.


BUL

YTD

-5.33%

1M

0.62%

6M

-4.86%

1Y

7.05%

5Y*

15.16%

10Y*

N/A

TMFC

YTD

-6.45%

1M

1.47%

6M

-1.47%

1Y

16.53%

5Y*

18.60%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUL vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for BUL: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BUL: 0.60%
Expense ratio chart for TMFC: current value is 0.50%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
TMFC: 0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BUL vs. TMFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BUL is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BUL is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BUL is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BUL is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BUL is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BUL is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMFC is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMFC is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BUL vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BUL, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
BUL: 0.34
TMFC: 0.81
The chart of Sortino ratio for BUL, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
BUL: 0.65
TMFC: 1.24
The chart of Omega ratio for BUL, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
BUL: 1.08
TMFC: 1.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for BUL, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
BUL: 0.35
TMFC: 0.90
The chart of Martin ratio for BUL, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
BUL: 1.25
TMFC: 3.36

The current BUL Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUL and TMFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.34
0.81
BUL
TMFC

Dividends

BUL vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than TMFC's 0.43% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
BUL
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
0.22%0.30%2.11%0.67%0.08%0.69%0.81%0.00%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
0.43%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.62%

Drawdowns

BUL vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and TMFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.12%
-9.81%
BUL
TMFC

Volatility

BUL vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) has a higher volatility of 16.55% compared to Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) at 15.36%. This indicates that BUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.55%
15.36%
BUL
TMFC