BUG vs. PAVE
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUG is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUG returned 6.86%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
BUG vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BUG having a 20.72% return and PAVE slightly lower at 19.88%.
BUG
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 33.08%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
BUG vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 20.72% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 7.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and PAVE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BUG and PAVE has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BUG vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUG
PAVE
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BUG
PAVE
Communication Services
BUG
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUG
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
BUG
PAVE
Healthcare
BUG
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
BUG
-
PAVE
Energy
BUG
-
PAVE
Financial Services
BUG
-
PAVE
-
Industrials
BUG
-
PAVE
Real Estate
BUG
-
PAVE
-
Utilities
BUG
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
PAVE
BUG vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUG | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.34 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 3.13 | -3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 11.50 | -11.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUG | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 1.99 | -1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.81 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.68 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
BUG vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -44.08% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.69% | -11.91% | -25.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | -26.23% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -26.23% | -15.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -1.82% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.42% | -6.24% | -8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 3.24% | +15.12% |
Volatility
BUG vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.42%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.07% | 6.42% | +7.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.81% | 15.17% | +10.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.78% | 18.84% | +11.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.47% | 21.60% | +6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.33% | 24.38% | +4.95% |
BUG vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and PAVE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to PAVE (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs 6.86% for BUG. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
BUG is categorized as Technology Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUG and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer