BUFX vs. FDL
BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUFX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.
Performance
BUFX vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFX achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return.
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
BUFX vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.33% | 9.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFX and FDL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFX vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
BUFX
FDL
BUFX vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.68 | 0.45 | +2.23 |
Drawdowns
BUFX vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFX and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -65.93% | +63.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -2.18% | +2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -9.66% | +9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
BUFX vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.98% | 11.28% | -7.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 14.31% | -10.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 17.11% | -13.13% |
BUFX vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFX vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFX and FDL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
BUFX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for BUFX and 0.45% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for BUFX and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer