PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFX vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFX vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFX achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 14.12% return.


BUFX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.86%
6M
4.31%
YTD
4.76%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.84%
6M
11.21%
YTD
14.12%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFX vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFX and FDL is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFX vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFX
BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFX vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFXFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.30

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

4.70

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.50

10.73

+8.77

BUFX vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFX and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFX vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFX and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFXFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-65.93%

+63.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-4.27%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.84%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-9.62%

+9.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

1.88%

-1.39%

Volatility

BUFX vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) is 0.96%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that BUFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFXFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

4.75%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

8.43%

-5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

11.67%

-7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.97%

14.37%

-10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.97%

17.12%

-13.15%

BUFX vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFX vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.72%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFX and FDL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to BUFX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFX dropped -2.87% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 1-year performance, FDL leads with 20.00% vs 9.47% for BUFX. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, BUFX has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDL has performed better with a 20.00% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

BUFX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for BUFX and 0.43% for FDL.

BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFX and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer