MTBA vs. QIS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) and QIS (Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify, while QIS is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MTBA returned 2.60% vs -48.32% for QIS. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MTBA charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for QIS.

Performance

MTBA vs. QIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly higher than QIS's -31.94% return.

MTBA

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.83%
• 6M: -1.11%
• YTD: -0.64%
• 1Y: 2.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.64%

QIS

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: 2.94%
• 6M: -34.00%
• YTD: -31.94%
• 1Y: -48.32%
• 3Y*: -24.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -24.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	$6.73M	$6.03M	$8.90M
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	$8.01K	$6.87K	$26.74K

MTBA vs. QIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	-0.64%	7.74%	1.99%	3.67%
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	-31.94%	-38.02%	0.19%	-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MTBA and QIS is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between MTBA and QIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MTBA vs. QIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTBA

MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 37
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 33

QIS

QIS Risk / Return Rank: 0
QIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
QIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
QIS Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTBA vs. QIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTBA	QIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	-1.26	+2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	-1.99	+3.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.77	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	-0.93	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.16	-1.62	+4.78

MTBA vs. QIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTBA Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the QIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTBA and QIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTBA vs. QIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum QIS drawdown of -62.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and QIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTBA	QIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-62.82%	+59.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-54.47%	+51.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-60.09%	+58.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-16.05%	+15.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	31.13%	-30.12%

Volatility

MTBA vs. QIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 0.84%, while Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a volatility of 14.48%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTBA	QIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	14.48%	-13.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.71%	32.96%	-30.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14%	40.15%	-37.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.92%	30.10%	-26.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.92%	30.10%	-26.18%

MTBA vs. QIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QIS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTBA vs. QIS - Dividend Comparison

MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than QIS's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	6.09%	5.98%	6.03%	0.48%
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	2.00%	3.37%	1.07%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTBA and QIS in my portfolio?

MTBA and QIS have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTBA or QIS?

QIS has higher volatility (14.48%) compared to MTBA (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTBA dropped -3.48% vs QIS's -62.82%.

Which ETF is better, MTBA or QIS?

On 1-year performance, MTBA leads with 2.60% vs -48.32% for QIS. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTBA has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTBA or QIS?

Over the 1-year period, MTBA has performed better with a 2.60% return vs -48.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTBA or QIS?

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTBA or QIS?

MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 2.00% for QIS.

What is the main difference between MTBA and QIS?

MTBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while QIS is Multistrategy. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTBA and 1.00% for QIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.