PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUCK vs. BENJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUCK vs. BENJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUCK achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly higher than BENJ's 1.87% return.


BUCK

1D
0.17%
1M
0.36%
6M
2.23%
YTD
2.44%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
10Y*

BENJ

1D
0.03%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.76%
YTD
1.87%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUCK vs. BENJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
2.44%3.42%
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
1.87%3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BUCK and BENJ is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUCK vs. BENJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BENJ
BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUCK vs. BENJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUCKBENJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

4.58

-3.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.80

9.83

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.12

46.29

-11.17

BUCK vs. BENJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUCK Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the BENJ Sharpe Ratio of 5.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUCK and BENJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUCK vs. BENJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUCK drawdown since its inception was -5.43%, which is greater than BENJ's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUCK and BENJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUCKBENJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-0.39%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.84%

-0.39%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-0.02%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.08%

+0.15%

Volatility

BUCK vs. BENJ - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) has a higher volatility of 0.43% compared to Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) at 0.16%. This indicates that BUCK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BENJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUCKBENJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

0.16%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.34%

0.27%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87%

0.68%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.45%

0.60%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.45%

0.60%

+2.85%

BUCK vs. BENJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUCK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BENJ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUCK vs. BENJ - Dividend Comparison

BUCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, while BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.29%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUCK and BENJ have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUCK has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to BENJ (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUCK dropped -5.43% vs BENJ's -0.39%.

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.13% vs 3.82% for BENJ. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.13% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BENJ.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.29%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

BUCK is categorized as Government Bonds, while BENJ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BUCK and 0.40% for BENJ.

BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.63 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUCK and BENJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer