BENJ vs. SFTY
BENJ (Horizon Landmark ETF) and SFTY (Horizon Managed Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BENJ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Horizon, while SFTY is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Horizon. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BENJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for SFTY.
Performance
BENJ vs. SFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BENJ achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than SFTY's 10.20% return.
BENJ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFTY
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BENJ vs. SFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF | 1.46% | 2.06% |
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 10.20% | 11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BENJ and SFTY is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BENJ vs. SFTY — Risk / Return Rank
BENJ
SFTY
BENJ vs. SFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BENJ | SFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BENJ | SFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.41 | 2.15 | +4.26 |
Drawdowns
BENJ vs. SFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BENJ drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, smaller than the maximum SFTY drawdown of -8.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BENJ and SFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BENJ | SFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -8.64% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.00% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -1.09% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility
BENJ vs. SFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BENJ | SFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67% | 11.62% | -10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.60% | 11.62% | -11.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.60% | 11.62% | -11.02% |
BENJ vs. SFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BENJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SFTY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
BENJ vs. SFTY - Dividend Comparison
BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 0.17% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BENJ and SFTY have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for SFTY.
SFTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.
BENJ is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SFTY is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BENJ and 0.77% for SFTY.
Find the right allocation for BENJ and SFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer