BENJ vs. NUKX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BENJ (Horizon Landmark ETF) and NUKX (Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BENJ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Horizon, while NUKX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas Wealth. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. BENJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for NUKX.

Performance

BENJ vs. NUKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BENJ

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUKX

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BENJ vs. NUKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	1.05%
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	-8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BENJ and NUKX is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026	-0.20

Return for Risk

BENJ vs. NUKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BENJ

BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 98
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

NUKX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BENJ vs. NUKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF (NUKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BENJ	NUKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.65	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	45.98	—	—

Drawdowns

BENJ vs. NUKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BENJ drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, smaller than the maximum NUKX drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BENJ and NUKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BENJ	NUKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-26.54%	+26.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-15.84%	+15.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-8.86%	+8.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BENJ	NUKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67%	52.44%	-51.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.60%	52.44%	-51.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.60%	52.44%	-51.84%

BENJ vs. NUKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BENJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKX's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

BENJ vs. NUKX - Dividend Comparison

BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%.

Position	TTM
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	0.00%
NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF	4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BENJ and NUKX in my portfolio?

BENJ and NUKX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BENJ or NUKX?

On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BENJ or NUKX?

BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUKX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BENJ or NUKX?

NUKX has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

What is the main difference between BENJ and NUKX?

BENJ is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while NUKX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Nicholas Wealth. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BENJ and 1.07% for NUKX.