BTRN vs. FSOL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) and FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTRN is passively managed, while FSOL is actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FSOL.

Performance

BTRN vs. FSOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -10.70% return, which is significantly higher than FSOL's -45.82% return.

BTRN

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -8.78%
• YTD: -10.70%
• 6M: -10.71%
• 1Y: -17.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSOL

• 1D: -3.84%
• 1M: -21.75%
• YTD: -45.82%
• 6M: -44.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTRN vs. FSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	-10.70%	-0.50%
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	-45.82%	-10.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BTRN and FSOL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

BTRN vs. FSOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTRN

BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FSOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTRN vs. FSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTRN	FSOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	—	—

Drawdowns

BTRN vs. FSOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum FSOL drawdown of -56.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and FSOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTRN	FSOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.97%	-56.33%	+19.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.45%	-54.57%	+28.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.66%	-31.23%	+16.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTRN	FSOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.61%	73.10%	-54.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.59%	73.10%	-42.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.59%	73.10%	-42.51%

BTRN vs. FSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTRN vs. FSOL - Dividend Comparison

BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.08%, more than FSOL's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	31.08%	27.76%	2.56%
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	2.21%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTRN and FSOL in my portfolio?

BTRN and FSOL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTRN or FSOL?

On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTRN or FSOL?

FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTRN or FSOL?

BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.08%, compared with 2.21% for FSOL.

What is the main difference between BTRN and FSOL?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTRN and 0.25% for FSOL.